Search Results

The 2-day foundational-level Fundamentals of GD&T course teaches the terms, rules, symbols, and concepts of geometric dimensioning and tolerancing, as prescribed in the ASME Y14.5-2018 Standard. The class offers an explanation of geometric tolerances, including their symbols, tolerance zones, applicable modifiers, common applications, and limitations. It explains Rules #1 and #2, the datum system, form and orientation controls, tolerance of position (RFS and MMC), runout, and profile controls. Newly acquired learning is reinforced throughout the class with more than 130 practice exercises, including more than 60 application problems. 

The 2-day foundational-level Fundamentals of GD&T course teaches the terms, rules, symbols, and concepts of geometric dimensioning and tolerancing, as prescribed in the ASME Y14.5-2009 Standard. The class offers an explanation of geometric tolerances, their symbols, tolerance zones, applicable modifiers, common applications, and limitations. It explains Rules #1 and #2, form and orientation controls, the datum system, tolerance of position (RFS and MMC), runout, and profile controls. Newly acquired learning is reinforced throughout the class with more than 80 practice exercises. 

This 3-day Fundamentals of GD&T course provides an in-depth study of the terms, rules, symbols, and concepts of geometric dimensioning and tolerancing, as prescribed in the ASME Y14.5-2018 Standard. The course can be conducted in three 8-hour sessions or with flexible scheduling including five mornings or five afternoons. 

Reducing CO2 emissions in on-the-road transport is important to limit global warming and follow a green transition towards net zero Carbon by 2050. In a long-term scenario, electrification will be the future of transportation. However, in the mid-term, the priority should be given more strongly to other technological alternatives (e.g., decarbonization of the electrical energy and battery recharging time). In the short- to mid-term, the technological and environmental reinforcement of ICEs could participate in the effort of decarbonization, also matching the need to reduce harmful pollutant emissions, mainly during traveling in urban areas. Engine thermal management represents a viable solution considering its potential benefits and limited implementation costs compared to other technologies. A variable flow coolant pump actuated independently from the crankshaft represents the critical component of a thermal management system.

For battery-electric vehicles (BEVs), the climate control and the driving range are crucial criteria in the ongoing electrification of automobiles in Europe towards the targeted carbon neutrality of the automotive industry. The thermal management system makes an important contribution to the energy efficiency and the cabin comfort of the vehicle. In addition to the system architecture, the refrigerant is crucial to achieve high cooling and heating performance while maintaining high efficiency and thus low energy consumption. Due to the high efficiency requirements for the vehicle, future system architectures will largely be heat pump systems. The alternative refrigerant R-474A based on the molecule R-1132(E) achieved top performance for both parameters in various system and vehicle tests.

In contrast to refrigeration circuits in internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) mainly used for cabin cooling, in electric vehicles (EVs) additional functions need to be taken into consideration, e.g., cabin heating, which in ICEVs is realized by the combustion engine’s waste heat, conditioning of the electric battery and drive train components. Additionally, each of these functions demands a different temperature level. Therefore, requirements towards the thermal management in EVs are more challenging. In modern EVs most of these functions are realized by direct refrigerant circuits, which are optimal in terms of efficiency and response time, however, result in greater complexity and different architectures for almost every vehicle model. In addition, the vast majority of EVs worldwide use chemical refrigerants that contain PFAS, e.g. R1234yf, which are known to be persistent and harmful for human health and environment.

A major issue of battery electric vehicles (BEV) is optimizing driving range and energy consumption. Under actual driving, transient thermal and electrical performance changes could deteriorate the battery cells and pack. These performances can be investigated and controlled efficiently with a thermal management system (TMS) via model-based development. A complete battery pack contains multiple cells, bricks, and modules with numerous coolant pipes and flow channels. However, such an early modeling stage requires detailed cell geometry and specifications to estimate the thermal and electrochemical energies of the cell, module, and pack. To capture the dynamic performance changes of the LIB pack under real driving cycles, the thermal energy flow between the pack and its TMS must be well predicted. This study presents a BTMS model development and validation method for a 75-kWh battery pack used in mass-production, mid-size battery SUV under WLTC.

Computer modelling, virtual prototyping and simulation is widely used in the automotive industry to optimize the development process. While the use of CAE is widespread, on its own it lacks the ability to provide observable acoustics or tactile vibrations for decision makers to assess, and hence optimize the customer experience. Subjective assessment using Driver-in-Loop simulators to experience data has been shown to improve the quality of vehicles and reduce development time and uncertainty. Efficient development processes require a seamless interface from detailed CAE simulation to subjective evaluations suitable for high level decision makers. In the context of perceived vehicle vibration, the need for a bridge between complex CAE data and realistic subjective evaluation of tactile response is most compelling. A suite of VI-grade noise and vibration simulators have been developed to meet this challenge.

This course applies advanced theory, physical tests and CAE to the assessment of ride, braking, steering and handling performance, governing state-space equations with transfer functions for primary ride and develop and analyze open loop handling. Building on the analysis of the state space equations, common physical tests and their corresponding CAE solutions for steady state and transient vehicle events.  The "state-of-the-art"  vehicle dynamics CAE, and common lab and vehicle tests with metrics used to assess chassis system and vehicle performance will be discussed.

If you’re working to balance the implementation of today’s urban ground mobility (UGM) vehicles with tomorrow’s biggest challenges and opportunities, then you belong at the premier of SAE’s Urban Ground Mobility Digital Summit.

Join our growing list of partners today by exhibiting or sponsoring at the Thermal Management Systems Symposium.

Meet like-minded mobility engineersto discuss new legislation and regulations around thermal management, emissions control, safety, and energy conservation.

The 2021 Innovations in Mobility Automotive Digital Summit — brought to you by SAE International® — is designed to bring together mobility organizations from across the industry in a neutral forum to accelerate their business and build future partnerships.

Evolving to MedDev provides a new opportunity for executives in aerospace, automotive and medical devices companies to connect and develop long-term growth strategies and find ways to meet the increased short-term demand for medical supplies

If you’re working to balance the implementation of today’s urban ground mobility (UGM) vehicles with tomorrow’s biggest challenges and opportunities, then you belong at the premier of SAE’s Urban Ground Mobility Digital Summit.