Search Results

Thermal management of lithium-Ion battery (LIB) has become very critical issue in recent years. One of the challenges for the design and packaging of the battery is to maintain the battery temperature within acceptable ranges and also reduce temperature gradients within the battery cells. Controlling the battery temperature is essential for the battery performance and the long-term battery life. Increased difference between battery cell temperatures can lead to non-uniform charging and non-uniform ageing of battery cells. The purpose of this paper is to investigate available technologies using heat pipes as a means of improving battery thermal management. Several studies have been conducted regarding the effect of heat pipes on battery temperature. However, in this paper we present a comprehensive study of heat pipes effects through transient analysis of a complete vehicle thermal model.

Lead-acid batteries have been widely used in automotive applications. Extending battery life and reducing battery warranty requires reducing any deteriorating to battery internals and battery electrolyte. At the end of battery life, it is required to maintain at least 50% of its initial capacity [1,2]. The rate of battery degradation increases at high battery temperatures due to increased rate of electrochemical reactions and potential loss of battery electrolyte. For Lead-Acid batteries, an electrolyte solution consists of diluted sulfuric acid. Battery electrolyte/water loss affects battery performance. Water loss is caused by high internal battery temperature and gassing off due to battery electrochemistry. High temperatures, high charging rates, and over charging can cause a loss of electrolyte in non-sealed batteries. In sealed batteries, the same factors will cause an increase in temperature and pressure which can eventually result in the release of hydrogen and oxygen gases.

Maintaining the fuel temperature and fuel system components below certain values is an important design objective. Predicting these temperatures is therefore one of the key parts of the vehicle’s thermal management process. One of the physical processes affecting fuel tank temperature is fuel vaporization, which is controlled by the vapor pressure in the tank, fuel composition and fuel temperature. Models are developed to enable the computation of the fuel temperature, fuel vaporization rate in the tank, fuel temperatures along the fuel supply lines, and follow its path to the charcoal canister and into the engine intake. For diesel fuel systems where a fuel return line is used to return excess fluid back to the fuel tank, an energy balance will be considered to calculate the heat added from the high-pressure pump and vehicle under-hood and underbody.

In this paper we present an integrated approach which combines analysis of the effect of simultaneous variations in model input parameters on component or system temperatures. The sensitivity analysis can be conducted by varying model input parameters using specific values that may be of interest to the user. The alternative approach is to use a structured set of parameters generated in the form of a DFSS DOE matrix. The matrix represents a combination of simulation conditions which combine the control factors (CF) and noise factors. CF’s are the design parameters that the engineer can modify to achieve a robust design. Noise factors include parameters that are outside the control of the design engineer. In automotive thermal management, noise factors include changes in ambient temperature, exhaust gas temperatures or aging of exhaust system or heat shields for example.