Search Results

The US Army is currently assessing the feasibility and defining the requirements of a Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL). This new lubricant would consist of an all-season (arctic to desert), fuel-efficient, multifunctional powertrain fluid with extended drain capabilities. As a developmental starting point, diesel engine testing has been conducted using the current MIL-PRF-46167D arctic engine oil at high temperature conditions representative of desert operation. Testing has been completed using three high density military engines: the General Engine Products 6.5L(T) engine, the Caterpillar C7, and the Detroit Diesel Series 60. Tests were conducted following two standard military testing cycles; the 210 hr Tactical Wheeled Vehicle Cycle, and the 400 hr NATO Hardware Endurance Cycle. Modifications were made to both testing procedures to more closely replicate the operation of the engine in desert-like conditions.

Assessment of braking performance that includes brake fade is a critical part of the evaluation of military light tactical vehicles as it is for conventional light cars and trucks. These vehicles are sometimes called upon to operate in severe mountain regions that challenge the braking performance well beyond the environment in which these vehicles are normally operated. The U.S. Army Test Operating Procedure (TOP) 2-2-608 includes a test schedule conducted in the mountainous region near Jennerstown, Pennsylvania. While this test procedure represents a typical mountain environment, it does not represent the most severe mountain descents that can be encountered across the United States. As a preliminary step to developing a representative severe mountain descent braking test, mountain roads throughout the United States were evaluated analytically to identify potential test venues.

Effectively determining automated driving system (ADS)-equipped vehicle (AV) safety without relying on testing an infeasibly large number of driving scenarios is a challenge with wide recognition in industry and academia. The following paper builds on previous work by the Institute of Automated Mobility (IAM) and Science Foundation Arizona (SFAz), and proposes a test selection and scoring methodology (TSSM) as part of a safety case-based framework being developed by the SFAz to ensure the safety of AVs while addressing the scenario testing challenge. The TSSM is an AV verification and validation (V&V) process that relies, in part, on iterative, partially random generation of AV driving scenarios. These scenarios are generated using an operational design domain (ODD) and behavioral competency portfolio, which expresses the vehicle ODD and behavioral competencies in terms of quantifiable amounts or intensities of discrete components.