Search Results

This paper focuses on the combustion development portion of the Advanced Combustion Controls Enabling Systems and Solutions (ACCESS) project, a joint research project partially funded by a Department of Energy grant. The main goal of the project is to improve fuel economy in a gasoline fueled light-duty vehicle by 30% while maintaining similar performance and meeting SULEV emission standards for the Federal Test Procedure (FTP) cycle. In this study, several combustion modes Spark Ignited (SI), Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI), Spark- Assisted Compression Ignition (SACI)) were compared under various conditions (naturally aspirated, boosted, lean, and stoichiometric) to compare the methods of controlled auto-ignition on a downsized, boosted multi-cylinder engine with an advanced valvetrain system capable of operating under wide negative valve overlap (NVO) conditions.

This paper focuses on the engine design portion of the Advanced Combustion Controls Enabling Systems and Solutions (ACCESS) project, a joint research project partially funded by a Department of Energy grant. The main goal of the project is to improve fuel economy in a gasoline fueled light-duty vehicle by 25% while maintaining similar performance and meeting SULEV emission standards. A Cadillac CTS with a high-feature naturally-aspirated 3.6L V6 engine was chosen as the baseline vehicle. To achieve the target fuel economy improvement over the baseline engine configuration, gasoline turbocharged direct-injection (GTDI) technology was utilized for engine downsizing in combination with part-load lean homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) operation for further fuel economy gains. The GM 2.0L I4 GTDI Ecotec engine was used as the platform for the basis of this design.

With the publication of ISO26262 [1] and the concept of Functional Safety, being able to identify the required safety integrity level for software components and defining the respective development steps has become increasingly important. A number of Tier 1 automotive suppliers, including Robert Bosch LLC, have been developing software for safety relevant systems, and have experience with a number of methods and tools for software analysis. This paper will focus on the pros and cons of the Criticality Analysis method. Criticality Analysis (CA) is a method that rates outputs, sub-components and inputs to a function based on the ASIL rating of the function. Faller [2] proposed the use of CA in conjunction with IEC 61508 safety standard, and this author proposes that the CA can also be used in conjunction with ISO 26262. CA allows taking a function with any ASIL rating and breaking down the signal chain to develop safety requirements at each stage (see [2, 3]).

This paper describes an investigation about the efficiency of safety-related non-functional software unit tests (NFSWUT). Well defined design, implementation and test processes are widely used in the respective industry. In order to fulfill the ISO 26262[1] requirement, additional effort is necessary to execute the NFSWUT. However, the efficiency of these tests is still not confirmed. This paper will provide an overview about an investigation of the effort-benefit ratio of the NFSWUT.