Search Results

This paper proposes a new approach to quantifying the rheological effects that come into play in traction fluids under different regimes of operation in elastohydrodynamic (EHD) contacts. We take account of shear thinning and viscoelasticity and of the joint temperature and pressure dependence of these effects and show how the resulting model conforms with measured traction coefficients for a typical traction fluid. Understanding the bulk rheology of traction fluids in detail is seen as an aid to designing more effective fluids and predicting performance in real engineering systems. Moreover, the form of the constitutive model used is consistent with molecular dynamics simulation studies, as described in the companion paper[1]. Thus, a fairly complete quantitative picture of traction fluid behaviour from the molecular level through to performance in a macroscopic contact is emerging.

The design of effective traction fluids and lubricants is facilitated by an understanding of how molecular structure within a fluid affects the behaviour of that fluid in-situ. Non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulation has been used to analyse how molecules of different structures behave in a fluid and to determine the influence of these separate behaviours on the different rheological properties of the fluids.

An emissions programme has been undertaken to gain information on the effect of selected fuel parameters on gasoline direct injection (G-DI) vehicle technology(1) with respect to exhaust emissions. Seven fuel parameters, namely aromatic, methyl-tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), sulphur and olefin content as well as 3 distillation parameters covering the whole boiling range, were independently investigated. It was found that, overall, the fuel effects on regulated (THC, CO, NOx), particulate (Pm), and CO2 emissions were relatively small.

There is increasing concern that small flakes of combustion chamber deposits (CCD) can break lose and get trapped between the exhaust valve and the seat resulting in difficulties in starting, rough running and increase in hydrocarbon emissions. In this paper we describe experimental observations which might explain how this flaking of CCD occurs and the factors that might be important in the phenomenon. The experiments include thirty one engine tests as well as tests done in a laboratory rig and show that some CCD flake when they are exposed to water; indeed water is far more effective in bringing this about than gasoline or other organic solvents. The hydrophilicity of the deposit surface which determines the penetration of water and the inherent susceptibility of the relevant deposit layer to inter-act with water are both important. Consequently there are large differences between deposits produced by different fuels and additives in terms of their susceptibility to flake.