Search Results

Systems engineering is not a new discipline for todays automotive OEMs and suppliers. So, why is it that many feel the discipline is under-utilized or not utilized at all in main-stream product development? For those that do believe systems engineering is a key activity in the development cycle, why is it common to disagree on a definition of what it is or how it manifests itself in the development cycle? If we examine the development activity of leading OEM's and suppliers in any industry, there can be no doubt that product development is a complex and intensive activity. Many disciplines are utilized with many specialized skills deployed throughout the lifecycle of the typical product, and even more so in the automotive industry. One can point to several processes that seem to indicate the presence of systems engineering, yet the ability to clearly define whether or not - and to what degree - we leverage systems engineering is still difficult.

Designing a lightweight and durable engine is universally important from the standpoints of fuel economy, vehicle dynamics and cost. However, it is challenging to theoretically find an optimal solution which meets both requirements in products such as the cylinder head, to which various thermal loads and mechanical loads are simultaneously applied. In our research, we focused on “non-parametric optimization” and attempted to establish a new design approach derived from the weight reduction of a cylinder head. Our optimization process consists of topology optimization and shape optimization. In the topology optimization process, we explored an optimal structure with the theoretically-highest stiffness in the given design space. This is to provide an efficient structure for pursuing both lightweight and durable characteristics in the subsequent shape optimization process.

Acoustic comfort of automotive cabins has progressively become one of the key attributes of passenger comfort within vehicle design. Wind noise and the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system noise are two of the key contributors to noise levels heard inside the car. The increasing prevalence of hybrid technologies and electrification has an associated reduction in powertrain noise levels. As such, the industry has seen an increasing focus on understanding and minimizing HVAC noise, as it is a main source of noise in the cabin particularly when the vehicle is stationary. The complex turbulent flow path through the ducts, combined with acoustic resonances can potentially lead to significant noise generation, both broadband and tonal.

In use cars often drive through the wakes of other vehicles. It has long been appreciated that this imposes a fluctuating onset flow which can excite a structural response in vehicle panels, particularly the bonnet. This structure must be designed to be robust to such excitation to guarantee structural integrity and maintain customer expectations of quality. As we move towards autonomous vehicles and exploit platoons for drag reduction, this onset flow condition merits further attention. The work reported here comprises both measurements and simulation capturing the unsteady pressure distribution over the bonnet of an SUV following a similar vehicle at high speed and in relatively close proximity. Measurements were taken during track testing and include 48 static measurement locations distributed over the bonnet where the unsteady static pressures were recorded.

Never in the history of the automotive industry has it been more critical for automakers to prove that they are capable of producing vehicles efficiently and cost-effectively. In the coming months and years there will be a growing requirement for lean product design and manufacturing strategies that will re-shape the way the automotive suppliers and OEMs conduct business. Computer-aided-design and manufacturing have become commonplace in automotive product design and manufacturing processes. These technologies enable efficiencies and quality improvements through virtual simulation and testing of kinematic designs. However, to date, there has been no ability to incorporate the process controls into these simulations. Vehicle introductions require new manufacturing processes and equipment which is typically outsourced by the OEMs to a supplier.

Thermal management on aircraft has been an important discipline for several decades. However, with the recent generations of high performance aircraft, thermal management has evolved more and more into a critical performance and capability constraint on the whole aircraft level. Fuel continues to be the most important heat sink on high performance aircraft, and consequently the requirements on thermal models of fuel systems are expanding. As the scope of modeling and simulation is widened in general, it is not meaningful to introduce a new isolated modeling and simulation capability. Instead, thermal models must be derived from existing model assets and eventually enable integration across several physical domains. This paper describes such an integrated approach based on the Modelica Fuel System Library and the 3DExperience Platform.

Today's engineers must meet program management demands within the context of the challenges facing the industry as a whole. Resource scarcity, both people and capital, is forcing the automotive industry to optimize the deployment and consumption of enterprise resources. As globally dispersed project teams become more commonplace, efficient and effective communication across geographies is critical. Market segmentation and technology are influencing how well manufacturers deliver products within performance and timing guidelines. Future success means providing global engineering teams with state- of- the- art tools and processes to unify disparate business groups in a virtual workspace -24/7. The solution to this is Product Lifecycle Management (PLM), a strategic business approach that supports collaborative creation across the enterprise and all stakeholders. PLM solutions link information from different authoring tools and others systems to the developing product configuration.

Mechatronics development continues to be a challenge for automotive OEM's and suppliers. Multi-disciplinary collaboration and development is critical, especially as architectures and solutions evolve in the automotive industry to satisfy changing needs of the customer and environment. New approaches to mobility, sustainment, and infotainment create the need for new combinations of electrical, software, mechanical, and chemical know-how. Whereas most frameworks for requirements-driven model-based design support a single discipline, what is really needed is a framework for requirements-driven model- based design that can capture the multi-disciplinary architecture of the vehicle or system. This would and allow development organizations to then further decompose the objects in support of further refinement and validation.

The Aerospace and Automotive industries face increasing product complexity and shortening of product development cycles. One critical means companies in these industries strive to directly overcome these challenges is through modeling and simulation. Beginning at the earliest phases in the new product development process, companies derive additional value through increased deployment of simulation across the entire product life-cycle. This paper discusses three areas: 1) the business case for change; 2) technology enablement of the various types of model-based simulators; 3) institutional mobilization to move to a new enterprise state that embraces new ways of working and engaging with existing and prospective customers. The business case for change focuses on two main points in acquisition: developing a detailed understanding of the system needs and systematically working through the techno-economic estimation challenges.

To increase sales and market position, automotive OEMs must have comprehensive strategies for developing innovative products while continuing to reduce costs, increase quality and accelerate time to market. One of the strategies that can help them to achieve these objectives is strategic modularity. A modularization strategy can help automakers reduce cost and time to market, as well as improve quality and launch readiness. While a significant number of OEMs are adopting modularity strategies, the realization of benefits has been, for many OEMs, limited in scope and scale. These limitations are due to: Process issues in managing dependencies across multiple programs and platforms; Measurements which discourage modularity adoption, together with an inability to measure enterprise costs; Organizational issues associated with siloed structures, a lack of clear roles and responsibilities, and the management of disparate groups across the extended enterprise.

The development of new vehicle is becoming increasingly complex: proliferation of on-board electronics, development of hybrid advanced powertrain technologies, globalization of design and production, to name a few. At the same time, companies are straining constantly to better meet consumer desires while reducing time to market and production costs. Definitely a tough challenge! The ever growing amount of data (both in variety and in number of sources) that the enterprise generates is central to this situation. Compiling and processing this data efficiently is easier said than done. And failure to do so can lead to critical business opportunities being lost! A solution exists. It comes from the web where an innovative approach was indeed mandatory to cope with the billions of documents to search. It is called “search technology” and is engrained in the DNA of EXALEAD.

Government regulations and consumer needs are driving automotive manufacturers to reduce vehicle energy consumption. However, this forms part of a complex landscape of regulation and customer needs. For instance, when reducing aerodynamic drag or vehicle weight for efficiency other important factors must be taken into account. This is seen in vehicle bonnet design. The bonnet is a large unsupported structure that is exposed to very high and often fluctuating aerodynamic loads, due to travelling in the wake of other vehicles. When travelling at high speed and in close proximity to other vehicles this unsteady aerodynamic loading can force the bonnet structure to vibrate, so-called “bonnet flutter”. A bonnet which is stiff enough to not flutter may be either too heavy for efficiency or insufficiently compliant to meet pedestrian safety requirements. On the other hand, a bonnet which flutters may be structurally compromised or undermine customer perceptions of vehicle quality.

Design of HVAC system plays an important role in acoustic comfort for passengers. With automotive world moving towards electrical vehicles where powertrain noise is low, designing low noise HVAC system is becoming more important. For an automobile manufacturer, ability to predict the production vehicle cabin noise at the early design stage is important as it allows more freedom for design changes, which can be incorporated in the vehicle at lower cost. Although HVAC prototype and system level testing at early design stage is possible for noise estimation but flow field is not visible in test that makes difficult to improve design. CFD simulation can provide detailed information on flow field, noise source strength and location. But in such a simulation, accurate prediction has been a challenge due to the inability of CFD tools to model acoustic absorptive characteristics of interior walls of cabin.

It is particularly easy to get tunnel vision as a domain expert, and focus only on the improvements one could provide in their area of expertise. To make matters worse, many Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) are silo-ed by domain of expertise, unconsciously promoting this single mindedness in design. Unfortunately, the successful and profitable development of a vehicle is dependent on the delicate balance of performance across many domains, involving multiple physics and departments. Taking for instance the design of a Heating, Ventilation & Air Conditioning (HVAC) system, the device’s primary function is to control the climate system in vehicle cabins, and more importantly to make sure that critical areas on the windshield can be defrosted in cold weather conditions within regulation time. With the advent of electric and autonomous vehicles, further importance is now also placed on the energy efficiency of the HVAC, and its noise.

For fuel cell vehicles, it is essential that the hydrogen tank be both compact and have sufficient hydrogen to ensure reasonable driving range for which there is a need to pressurize the hydrogen in the tank at levels much higher than that of atmospheric pressure. Furthermore, fast filling is an important consideration in order to minimize time to refuel hydrogen in the tank. In this article, we investigate a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methodology to see whether we can simulate the fast filling of the hydrogen tank. We performed simulations on an existing validation case using coupled simulation approach between the PowerFLOW® flow solver and PowerTHERM® the thermal solver. For an accurate simulation at elevated pressure levels, we implemented a real gas behavior that is more accurate than the ideal gas equation of state for under these conditions. We observe good agreement with experimental data for both bulk and local variations in temperature.

Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) is a process where one injects an aqueous solution of urea into a diesel exhaust system in order to reduce NOx emissions. The urea solution known as AdBlue® or Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF) is stored in a DEF Tank that can under cold weather conditions freeze over. Since AdBlue® is unusable while frozen, we use heaters installed in the tanks to melt AdBlue® with government regulations mandating time required to melt AdBlue® in the tank. In this article, we investigate whether a CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) based methodology can accurately evaluate time required in melting AdBlue® for a given DEF Tank and heater coil design for a production vehicle as per standard testing procedure. Simulations used a coupled methodology with PowerFLOW® as the flow solver and PowerTHERM® as the thermal solver. The flow simulation did require an accurate modelling of phase change from solid to liquid for AdBlue®.

Windscreen wipers are an integral component of the windscreen cleaning systems of most vehicles, trains, cars, trucks, boats and some planes. Wipers are used to clear rain, snow, and dirt from the windscreen pushing the water from the wiped surface. Under certain conditions however, water which has been driven to the edge of the windscreen by the wiper can be drawn back into the driver’s field of view by aerodynamic forces introduced by the wiper motion. This is wiper drawback, an undesirable phenomenon as the water which is drawn back on to the windscreen can reduce driver’s vision and makes the wiper less effective. The phenomena of wiper drawback can be tested for in climatic tunnels using sprayer systems to wet the windscreen. However, these tests require a bespoke test property or prototype vehicle, which means that the tests are done fairly late in the development of the vehicle.

This paper presents an aerodynamic degradation study of an iced airfoil, using the Lattice Boltzmann approach with the commercial software PowerFLOW. Three-dimensional numerical simulations were performed with an extruded constant section of the GLC-305 airfoil with a leading-edge double-horn ice shape using periodic boundary conditions. The freestream Reynolds number, based on the chord, is 3.5 million and the Mach number is 0.12. An extensive comparison of the main flow features with experimental data is performed, including aerodynamic coefficients, pressure coefficient distributions, velocity and turbulence contours along with its profiles at several positions, and stagnation streamlines. The drag coefficient agrees well with experiments, in spite of a small shift. Two different wind tunnel measurements, using different measurement techniques, were compared to the CFD results, which mostly stayed in between the experimental data.

Market demands for increased fuel economy and reduced emissions are placing higher aerodynamic and thermal analysis demands on vehicle designers and engineers. These analyses are usually carried out by different engineering groups in different parts of the design cycle. Design changes required to improve vehicle aerodynamics often come at the price of part thermal performance and vice versa. These design changes are frequently a fix for performance issues at a single performance point such as peak power, peak torque, or highway cruise. In this paper, the motivation for a holistic approach in the form of multi-disciplinary optimization (MDO) early in the design process is presented. Using a Response-surface Informed Transient Thermal Model (RITThM) a vehicle's thermal performance through a drive cycle is predicted and correlated to physical testing for validation.

Predicting Exterior Water Management is important for developing vehicles that meet customer expectations in adverse weather. Fluid film methods, with Lagrangian tracking, can provide spray and surface water simulations for complex vehicle geometries in on-road conditions. To cope with this complexity and provide practical engineering simulations, such methods rely on empirical sub-models to predict phenomena such as the film stripping from the surface. Experimental data to develop and validate such models is difficult to obtain therefore here a high-fidelity Coupled Level-set Volume of Fluid (CLSVOF) simulation is carried out. CLSVOF resolves the interface of the liquid in three dimensions; allowing direct simulation of film behaviour and interaction with the surrounding air. This is used to simulate a simplified wing-mirror, with air flow, on which water is introduced.