Criteria

Text:
Display:

Results

Viewing 1 to 30 of 86
HISTORICAL
1983-10-01
Standard
J1134_198310
This SAE Recommended Practice establishes a single bolt pattern for the No. 1 clutch housing (see Figure 1) and the No. 2 clutch housing (see Figure 2). These four bolt patterns are designated to give commonality of mounting brackets in existing frame rails. The 420 mm (16.5 in) span, pad face to pad face, allows the ease of installation in existing frame rail widths. This is also the minimum spacing which will accommodate commonly used clutches.
HISTORICAL
1976-01-01
Standard
J1134_197601
This SAE Recommended Practice establishes a single bolt pattern for the No. 1 clutch housing (see Figure 1) and the No. 2 clutch housing (see Figure 2). These four bolt patterns are designated to give commonality of mounting brackets in existing frame rails. The 420 mm (16.5 in) span, pad face to pad face, allows the ease of installation in existing frame rail widths. This is also the minimum spacing which will accommodate commonly used clutches.
CURRENT
2017-08-14
Standard
J1134_201708
This SAE Recommended Practice establishes a single bolt pattern for the No. 1 clutch housing (see Figure 1) and the No. 2 clutch housing (see Figure 2). These four bolt patterns are designated to give commonality of mounting brackets in existing frame rails. The 420 mm (16.5 in) span, pad face to pad face, allows the ease of installation in existing frame rail widths. This is also the minimum spacing which will accommodate commonly used clutches.
HISTORICAL
2000-04-26
Standard
J1134_200004
This SAE Recommended Practice establishes a single bolt pattern for the No. 1 clutch housing (see Figure 1) and the No. 2 clutch housing (see Figure 2). These four bolt patterns are designated to give commonality of mounting brackets in existing frame rails. The 420 mm (16.5 in) span, pad face to pad face, allows the ease of installation in existing frame rail widths. This is also the minimum spacing which will accommodate commonly used clutches.
HISTORICAL
2003-04-23
Standard
J1857_200304
Although not limited to, these flywheels are normally used on trucks considered as Medium-Duty (Class 6 and 7), as well as Heavy-Duty (Class 8) trucks.
CURRENT
2017-09-19
Standard
J1857_201709
Although not limited to, these flywheels are normally used on trucks considered as Medium-Duty (Class 6 and 7), as well as Heavy-Duty (Class 8) trucks.
HISTORICAL
2001-06-12
Standard
J1731_200106
This SAE Recommended Practice describes STANDARD-DUTY and EXTREME-DUTY Pilot Bearing requirements and sizes for class 6, 7, and 8 on-highway trucks and buses that use diesel engines and manual transmissions. The recommendations may apply to a wide range of other pilot-bearing applications, such as agricultural, industrial, and construction equipment.
CURRENT
2002-07-23
Standard
J1929_200207
HISTORICAL
1990-02-01
Standard
J1915_199002
This SAE Recommended Practice is prepared as a guideline to improve and maintain the quality of remanufactured automotive products. Installation of remanufactured or rebuilt products is often an economical way to repair a vehicle even though they may not fully be equivalent to original equipment parts. Before processing any part, a remanufacturer should determine if the original design and present condition of the core are suitable for remanufacturing, so as to provide durable operation of the part as well as acceptable performance when installed in a vehicle. The remanufacturer should also carefully consider the safety aspects of the product and any recommendations of the original manufacturer related to remanufacturing or rebuilding their product.
HISTORICAL
2000-08-28
Standard
J1915_200008
This SAE Recommended Practice is prepared as a guideline to improve and maintain the quality of remanufactured automotive products. Installation of remanufactured or rebuilt products is often an economical way to repair a vehicle even though they may not fully be equivalent to original equipment parts. Before processing any part, a remanufacturer should determine if the original design and present condition of the core are suitable for remanufacturing, so as to provide durable operation of the part as well as acceptable performance when installed in a vehicle. The remanufacturer should also carefully consider the safety aspects of the product and any recommendations of the original manufacturer related to remanufacturing or rebuilding their product.
CURRENT
2017-08-22
Standard
J1915_201708
This SAE Recommended Practice is prepared as a guideline to improve and maintain the quality of remanufactured automotive products. Installation of remanufactured or rebuilt products is often an economical way to repair a vehicle even though they may not fully be equivalent to original equipment parts. Before processing any part, a remanufacturer should determine if the original design and present condition of the core are suitable for remanufacturing, so as to provide durable operation of the part as well as acceptable performance when installed in a vehicle. The remanufacturer should also carefully consider the safety aspects of the product and any recommendations of the original manufacturer related to remanufacturing or rebuilding their product.
HISTORICAL
2001-09-07
Standard
J1608_200109
Provide standard shift pattern guidelines for manual transmission shift controls in light, medium, and heavy trucks and buses.
HISTORICAL
2012-11-09
Standard
J1608_201211
Provide standard shift pattern guidelines for manual transmission shift controls in light, medium, and heavy trucks and buses.
CURRENT
2017-08-15
Standard
J1608_201708
Provide standard shift pattern guidelines for manual transmission shift controls in light, medium, and heavy trucks and buses.
HISTORICAL
1992-04-01
Standard
J1540_199204
Because of the intense focus on fuel economy and fuel emission standards, it has become imperative to optimize vehicle drivetrains. In light of this, component efficiencies have become an important factor in the drivetrain decision-making process. It has therefore become necessary to develop a universal standard to judge transmission efficiency. This SAE Recommended Practice specifies a test procedure which maps torque transmittal efficiency and parasitic losses for manual transmissions. The application of this document is intended for manual transmissions used in light (class 4) through heavy truck applications with both simple and compound ratio structures. This document is separated into two parts. The first compares input and output torque throughout a specified input speed range in order to determine the overall transmission efficiency. This test is used to evaluate all forward gears; testing in reverse is optional.
CURRENT
2012-11-09
Standard
J1540_201211
Because of the intense focus on fuel economy and fuel emission standards, it has become imperative to optimize vehicle drivetrains. In light of this, component efficiencies have become an important factor in the drivetrain decision-making process. It has therefore become necessary to develop a universal standard to judge transmission efficiency. This SAE Recommended Practice specifies a test procedure which maps torque transmittal efficiency and parasitic losses for manual transmissions. The application of this document is intended for manual transmissions used in light (class 4) through heavy truck applications with both simple and compound ratio structures. This document is separated into two parts. The first compares input and output torque throughout a specified input speed range in order to determine the overall transmission efficiency. This test is used to evaluate all forward gears; testing in reverse is optional.
HISTORICAL
2000-11-02
Standard
J1540_200011
Because of the intense focus on fuel economy and fuel emission standards, it has become imperative to optimize vehicle drivetrains. In light of this, component efficiencies have become an important factor in the drivetrain decision-making process. It has therefore become necessary to develop a universal standard to judge transmission efficiency. This SAE Recommended Practice specifies a test procedure which maps torque transmittal efficiency and parasitic losses for manual transmissions. The application of this document is intended for manual transmissions used in light (class 4) through heavy truck applications with both simple and compound ratio structures. This document is separated into two parts. The first compares input and output torque throughout a specified input speed range in order to determine the overall transmission efficiency. This test is used to evaluate all forward gears; testing in reverse is optional.
2018-01-02
WIP Standard
J1667
This SAE Recommended Practice applies to vehicle exhaust smoke measurements made using the Snap-Acceleration test procedure. Because this is a non-moving vehicle test, this test can be conducted along the roadside, in a truck depot, a vehicle repair facility, or other test facilities. The test is intended to be used on heavy-duty trucks and buses powered by diesel engines. It is designed to be used in conjunction with smokemeters using the light extinction principle of smoke measurement. This procedure describes how the snap-acceleration test is to be performed. It also gives specifications for the smokemeter and other test instrumentation and describes the algorithm for the measurement and quantification of the exhaust smoke produced during the test. Included are discussions of factors which influence snap-acceleration test results and methods to correct for these conditions.
CURRENT
1996-02-01
Standard
J1667_199602
This SAE Recommended Practice applies to vehicle exhaust smoke measurements made using the Snap-Acceleration test procedure. Because this is a non-moving vehicle test, this test can be conducted along the roadside, in a truck depot, a vehicle repair facility, or other test facilities. The test is intended to be used on heavy-duty trucks and buses powered by diesel engines. It is designed to be used in conjunction with smokemeters using the light extinction principle of smoke measurement. This procedure describes how the snap-acceleration test is to be performed. It also gives specifications for the smokemeter and other test instrumentation and describes the algorithm for the measurement and quantification of the exhaust smoke produced during the test. Included are discussions of factors which influence snap-acceleration test results and methods to correct for these conditions.
HISTORICAL
2005-12-12
Standard
J1621_200512
This SAE Recommended Practice has been adopted by SAE to specify: a. a basis for net engine retarder power rating; b. reference inlet air test conditions; c. a method for correcting observed engine retarder power to reference conditions; and d. a method for determining net engine retarder power with a dynamometer.
CURRENT
2012-07-02
Standard
J1621_201207
This SAE Recommended Practice has been adopted by SAE to specify: A basis for net engine retarder power rating Reference inlet air test conditions A method for correcting observed engine retarder power to reference conditions A method for determining net engine retarder power with a dynamometer
CURRENT
2012-11-09
Standard
J1463_201211
This SAE Recommended Practice documents the typical transmission interface dimensions that are used with 14-in and larger pull-type clutches. See Figure 1.
HISTORICAL
2003-04-24
Standard
J1463_200304
This SAE Recommended Practice documents the typical transmission interface dimensions that are used with 14-in and larger pull-type clutches. See Figure 1. Purpose Provide dimensional guidelines for current and future designs and thus promote interchangeability between various clutch and transmission combinations. Due to the variety of clutches and transmission mounted clutch housings, no standard clearance envelope can be established without imposing design restrictions. It is recommended that any specific combination be verified for clearance before incorporating in design.
HISTORICAL
1999-09-21
Standard
J1479_199909
This SAE Standard describes the terms or names of the parts, characteristics, and parameters of automotive pull-type clutches used in trucks, and of vehicle apparatus or components related to the pull-type clutch.
HISTORICAL
1985-01-01
Standard
J1479_198501
This SAE Standard describes the terms or names of the parts, characteristics, and parameters of automotive pull-type clutches used in trucks, and of vehicle apparatus or components related to the pull-type clutch.
CURRENT
2012-11-09
Standard
J1479_201211
This SAE Standard describes the terms or names of the parts, characteristics, and parameters of automotive pull-type clutches used in trucks, and of vehicle apparatus or components related to the pull-type clutch.
CURRENT
2000-05-01
Standard
J1489_200005
The procedure covers the estimation of the total retardation capability available to a specific vehicle from: Natural retardation (rolling resistance, aerodynamic drag, etc). Engine drag Engine, integral automatic transmission, driveline or trailer-axle retarders It assumes that foundation brakes are not used for maintaining speed on long mountain descents. Retardation is rated in terms of the maximum grades on which stable control speeds can be maintained for each gear over the range of highway speeds appropriate to that gear. For each gear, the calculation procedure determines maximum grades for at least four values of control speed ranging from the vehicle velocity corresponding to full load governed engine rpm, to the vehicle velocity corresponding to the engine rpm at minimum (idle) speed. In addition, the calculation procedure provides information on the total retarding power available for each gear.
HISTORICAL
1979-06-01
Standard
J1266_197906
Data from this SAE Recommended Practice permit mapping axle efficiency and/or waste energy over the operating range of trucks, busses, and other highway vehicles based on truck chasses. The procedure can be applied to single axles, tandem axles as a system, or other systems, by combining separate tests, such as tests of the front axle and power divider and rear axle of tandem or tri-drive type.
HISTORICAL
1990-06-01
Standard
J1266_199006
Data from this SAE Recommended Practice permit mapping axle efficiency and/or waste energy over the operating range of trucks, busses, and other highway vehicles based on truck chasses. The procedure can be applied to single axles, tandem axles as a system, or other systems, by combining separate tests, such as tests of the front axle and power divider and rear axle of tandem or tri-drive type.
CURRENT
2001-04-27
Standard
J1266_200104
Data from this SAE Recommended Practice permit mapping axle efficiency and/or waste energy over the operating range of trucks, busses, and other highway vehicles based on truck chasses.
Viewing 1 to 30 of 86

Filter

  • Range:
    to:
  • Year: