Search Results

This paper reviews the literature on deposits that form on all internal surfaces coming into contact with the fuel in a gasoline engine. It does not consider deposits that can form in areas primarily affected by the engine lubricant. The physical, and especially the chemical, mechanisms that lead to deposit formation are very complex and poorly understood, and are different in different parts of the engine. Deposits can impair engine operation in terms of fuel economy, power emissions, octane requirement and driveability. In the worst cases they could lead to engine damage. Deposits in most parts of the engine can be controlled through the use of fuel additives. Test procedures used in deposit-related studies are characterised by poor repeatability and reproducibility because of the complex nature of the processes involved. Deposit formation and, consequently, the effectiveness of deposit control additives also depend on base fuel properties and engine design and operation.

Previous work has shown that it may be advantageous to use gasoline type fuels with long ignition delays compared to today's diesel fuels in compression ignition engines. In the present work we investigate if high volatility is also needed along with low cetane (high octane) to get more premixed combustion leading to low NO and smoke. A single-cylinder light-duty compression ignition engine is run on four fuels in the diesel boiling range and three fuels in the gasoline boiling range. The lowest cetane diesel boiling range fuel (DCN = 22) also has very high aromatic content (75%vol) but the engine can be run on this to give very low NO (≺ 0.4 g/kWh) and smoke (FSN ≺ 0.1), e.g,. at 4 bar and 10 bar IMEP at 2000 RPM like the gasoline fuels but unlike the diesel fuels with DCNs of 40 and 56. If the combustion phasing and delay are matched for any two fuels at a given operating condition, their emissions behavior is also matched regardless of the differences in volatility and composition.

A Swedish MK1 diesel fuel and a European gasoline of ∼95 RON have been compared in a single cylinder CI engine operating at 1200 RPM with an intake pressure of 2 bar abs., intake temperature of 40°C and 25% stoichiometric EGR at different fuelling rates and using different injection strategies. For the same operating conditions, gasoline always gives much lower smoke compared to the diesel fuel because of its higher ignition delay; this usually allows the heat release to be separate in time from the injection event. NOx can be controlled by EGR. With dual injection, for diesel fuel, there can be significant heat release during the compression stroke because of the pilot injection earlier in the compression stroke. For a fixed total fuelling rate, compared to single injection, this reduces fuel efficiency and increases the lowest achievable level of smoke.

A study has been undertaken with a single-cylinder engine, based on the Mitsubishi GDi combustion system, that has the option of either port injection or direct injection. Tests have been undertaken with pure fuel components (methane, iso-octane, toluene and methanol), and a representative gasoline that has also been tested with the addition of 10% methanol and 10% ethanol. The volumetric efficiency depends both on the fuel and its time and place of injection. For stoichiometric operation with unleaded gasoline, changing from port injection to direct injection led to a 9% increase in volumetric efficiency, which was improved by a further 3% when 10% methanol was blended with the gasoline. The improvements in volumetric efficiency will be used to quantify the extent of charge cooling by fuel evaporation, and these will be compared with predictions assuming the maximum possible level of fuel evaporation.

Oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and smoke can be simultaneously reduced in compression ignition engines by getting combustion to occur at low temperatures and by delaying the heat release till after the fuel and air have been sufficiently mixed. One of the ways to obtain such combustion in modern engines using common-rail direct injection is to inject the fuel near top dead centre with high levels of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) - Nissan MK style combustion. In this work we study the effect of fuel auto-ignition quality, using four fuels ranging from diesel to gasoline, on such combustion at two inlet pressures and different EGR levels. The experiments are done in a 2 litre single-cylinder engine with a compression ratio of 14 at an engine speed of 1200 RPM. The engine can be easily run on gasoline with a single injection near TDC, even though it cannot be run with very early injection, in the HCCI mode.

Net heat release rates and knock characteristics were derived from in-cylinder pressures for different fuels in a single-cylinder engine; the effect of an ashless antiknock, N-methyl aniline (NMA) was also studied. The maximum net heat release rate (MHRR) resulting from the final high-temperature chemistry determines the knock intensity. Paraffinic fuels have similar knock intensities at comparable knock occurrence frequencies. Aromatic fuels have significantly lower MHRRs and give much lower mean knock intensities for a given knock occurrence frequency compared to paraffinic fuels. Adding NMA to a paraffinic fuel increases the spark advance required to get a chosen frequency of knock occurrence as it increases the octane number of the fuel but has little effect on MHRR and hence knock intensity.

A four-cylinder engine with a slice between the head and the block carrying instrumented plugs has been used to study the growth of combustion chamber deposits and knock. Deposit thicknesses vary substantially at different locations, the thickness generally being greatest at the coolest surfaces. If a dirty engine is run on a low-boiling-point fuel such as a primary reference fuel, deposits are removed and octane requirement is reduced rapidly. Of the head deposits, those in the cooler squish region where the end gas is likely to be situated affect knock more than the deposits in the hotter regions. Different fuel additives have different effects on deposits in different areas. For instance, an additive might cause a substantial increase in deposit thickness in the hotter areas and a slight increase in total deposit weight but can control deposits in the cooler squish regions and so reduce octane requirement increase (ORI) compared to the base fuel alone.

In previous work it has been shown that the autoignition quality of a fuel at a given operating condition can be described by its Octane Index, OI = (1-K)RON - KMON; the larger the OI, the more the resistance to autoignition. Here RON and MON are, respectively, the Research and Motor Octane numbers of the fuel and K is a constant depending only on the pressure and temperature history of the fuel / air mixture in the engine prior to autoignition. The value of K is empirically established at a given operating condition by ranking fuels of different RON and MON and of different chemical composition for their ease of autoignition. Another important parameter at a given operating condition is OI0, the Octane Index of the fuel for which heat release is centred at TDC. In previous work K and OI0 were measured at different operating conditions and were related empirically to pressure and temperature of the mixture before autoignition and to engine speed and mixture strength.

The auto-ignition or anti-knock quality of a practical fuel is defined by the Octane Index, OI = (1-K)RON + KMON where RON and MON are the Research and Motor Octane numbers and K is a constant depending only on the pressure and temperature variation in the engine. K decreases as the compression temperature in the unburnt gas at a given pressure in the engine decreases and can be negative if this temperature is lower than in the RON test. As spark ignition (SI) engine designers seek higher efficiency knock becomes more likely. Moreover such initiatives - direct injection, higher compression ratios, downsizing and turbocharging - will reduce the unburnt gas temperature for a given pressure and push the value of K downwards. In Europe there is evidence of a monotonic decrease in the average K value from 1987 to 1992. In 37 different Japanese and European cars (34 models) equipped with knock sensors that have been tested K has been found to be negative in most cases.

The anti-knock or octane quality of a fuel depends on the fuel composition as well as on the engine design and operating conditions. The true octane quality of practical fuels is defined by the Octane Index, OI = (1-K)RON + KMON where K is a constant for a given operating condition and depends only on the pressure and temperature variation in the engine (it is not a property of the fuel). RON and MON are the Research and Motor Octane numbers respectively, of the fuel. OI is the octane number of the primary reference fuel (PRF) with the same knocking behaviour at the given condition. In this work a wide range of fuels of different RON and MON were tested in prototype direct injection spark ignition (DISI) engines with compression ratios of 11 and 12.5 at different speeds up to 6000 RPM. Knock Limited Spark Advance (KLSA) was used to characterize the anti-knock quality of the fuel. Experiments were also done using two cars with DISI engines equipped with knock sensor systems.