Search Results

The goal of the Bicyclist Test Mannequin Task Force is to develop standard specifications/requirements for bicyclist test mannequins (one adult and one child) that are representative of real bicyclists to the sensors used in Bicyclist Detection systems and can be used for performance assessment of such in-vehicle systems (including warning and/or braking) in real world test scenarios/conditions. This version of the document only includes the recommended bicyclist mannequin characteristics for vision, Lidar, and/or 76 to 78 GHz radar-based Bicyclist Pre-Collision systems.

The goal of the Pedestrian Test Mannequin Task Force is to develop standard specifications/requirements for pedestrian test mannequins (1 adult and 1 child) that are representative of real pedestrians to the sensors used in Pedestrian Detection systems and can be used for performance assessment of such in-vehicle systems (including warning and/or braking) in real world test scenarios/conditions. This version of the document only includes the pedestrian mannequin for vision, Lidar, and/or 76 to 78 GHz radar based Pedestrian Pre-collision systems.

This document will provide methodologies and procedures to validate active safety test targets and correlate them to the objects they are intended to represent. This process will be separated into three procedures. The correlation procedure will document a means of measuring representative object characteristics and how to calculate a correlation score for a test target using that objective characteristic measurement. The validation procedure will be utilized to determine the correlation score for the test target. A confirmation procedure will identify unacceptable characteristic deviations of the targets during use in the field. Test targets may include cars, pedestrians, motorcycles, bicycles, or any other object that may be encountered by a vehicle. This document relates only to the radar characteristics of these test targets.

The scope of this document is to provide the design specifications/requirements/guidelines for concrete divider surrogates that represent actual concrete dividers to the in-vehicle sensors and can be used for performance assessment of such in-vehicle sensing systems in real-world test scenarios/conditions. Therefore, this document only includes the recommended concrete divider surrogate characteristics for automotive cameras, LiDARs, and/or radars. Concrete dividers are also known as concrete barriers [1].

The scope of this document is to provide the design specifications/requirements for concrete curb surrogates that represent real concrete curb to the in-vehicle sensors and can be used for performance assessment of such in-vehicle sensing systems in real-world test scenarios/conditions. This document includes the recommended concrete curb surrogate characteristics for automotive cameras, LiDARs, and/or radar sensors.

The scope of this document is to provide the design specifications/requirements for metal guardrail surrogates that represent real metal guardrails to the in-vehicle sensors and can be used for performance assessment of such in-vehicle sensing systems in real-world test scenarios/conditions. This document only includes the recommended metal guardrail surrogate characteristics for automotive cameras, LiDARs, and/or radars.

Develop and propose an SAE Recommended Practice for AEB system performance testing which: 1. Establishes uniform vehicle level test procedures 2. Identifies target equipment, test scenarios, and measurement methods 3. Identifies and explains the performance data of interest 4. Does not exclude any particular system or sensor technology 5. Identifies the known limitations of the information contained within (assumptions and "gap") 6. Intended to be a guide toward standard practice and is subject to change on pace with the technology 7. Limited to "Vehicle Front to Rear, In-lane Scenarios" for initial release

This document describes an SAE Recommended Practice for Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) system performance testing which: establishes uniform vehicle level test procedures identifies target equipment, test scenarios, and measurement methods identifies and explains the performance data of interest does not exclude any particular system or sensor technology identifies the known limitations of the information contained within (assumptions and “gaps”) is intended to be a guide toward standard practice and is subject to change on pace with the technology is limited to “Vehicle Front to Rear, In lane Scenarios” for initial release This document describes the equipment, facilities, methods and procedures needed to evaluate the ability of Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) systems to detect and respond to another vehicle, in its immediate forward path, as it is approached from the rear. This document does not specify test conditions (e.g., speeds, decelerations, headways, etc.).

This SAE Recommended Practice establishes a test procedure for the evaluation of lane departure warning (LDW), lane keeping assistance (LKA), and lane centering assistance systems used in passenger vehicles and light trucks. This test procedure does not intend to exclude any particular system or sensing technology. The recommended practice can be used to test the functionality and performance of LDW, LKA, and lane centering assistance systems by assessing their ability to (1) warn (LDW) or control (LKA, lane centering assistance) in response to an unintended lane departure, and (2) the ability to indicate a system disengagement. The human machine interface (HMI) is not addressed herein but is considered in SAE J2808. The recommended practice specifies lane markers to enable lane departure testing, or road edges, to enable testing of road departure mitigation systems. The document is separated into two tiers.

The current document is a part of an effort of the Active Safety Systems Committee, Active Safety Systems Sensors Task Force whose objectives are to: a. Identify the functionality and performance you could expect from active safety sensors b. Establish a basic understanding of how sensors work c. Establish a basic understanding of how sensors can be tested d. Describe an exemplar set of acceptable requirements and tests associated with each technology e. Describe the key requirements/functionality for the test targets f. Describe the unique characteristics of the targets or tests This document will cover items (a) and (b).

The current document is a part of an effort of the Active Safety Systems Committee, Active Safety Systems Sensors Task Force whose objectives are to: a Identify the functionality and performance you could expect from active safety sensors b Establish a basic understanding of how sensors work c Establish a basic understanding of how sensors can be tested d Describe an exemplar set of acceptable requirements and tests associated with each technology e Describe the key requirements/functionality for the test targets f Describe the unique characteristics of the targets or tests This document will cover items (a) and (b).

This SAE Technical Information Report provides a compendium of terms, definitions, abbreviations, and acronyms to enable common terminology for use in engineering reports, diagnostic tools, and publications related to active safety systems. This information report is a survey of active safety systems and related terms. The definitions offered are descriptions of functionality rather than technical specifications. Included are warning and momentary intervention systems, which do not automate any part of the dynamic driving task (DDT) on a sustained basis (SAE Level 0 as defined in SAE J3016), as well as definitions of select features that perform part of the DDT on a sustained basis (SAE Level 1 and 2).

This SAE Information Report provides a compendium of terms, definitions, abbreviations, and acronyms to enable common terminology for use in engineering reports, diagnostic tools, and publications related to active safety systems. This information report is a survey of active safety systems and related terms. The definitions offered are descriptions of functionality rather than technical specifications. Included are warning and momentary intervention systems, which do not automate any part of the dynamic driving task (DDT) on a sustained basis (SAE Level 0 as defined in SAE J3016), as well as definitions of select features that perform part of the DDT on a sustained basis (SAE Level 1 and 2).

This SAE Technical Information Report provides a compendium of terms, definitions, abbreviations, and acronyms to enable common terminology for use in engineering reports, diagnostic tools and publications related to active safety systems. This information report is a survey of active safety systems and related terms. The definitions offered are descriptions of functionality rather than technical specifications. Included are warning and momentary intervention systems, which do not automate any part of the dynamic driving task on a sustained basis like those defined in SAE J3016 Automated Driving Systems.

This SAE Information Report provides a compendium of terms, definitions, abbreviations, and acronyms to enable common terminology for use in engineering reports, diagnostic tools, and publications related to active safety systems. This information report is a survey of terms related to calibration of active safety systems. The definitions offered are descriptions of inputs, outputs, and processes rather than technical specifications. Definitions for end-of-line procedures are not included.