Search Results

Choosing the best approach to meet waste processing requirements for long duration space missions should be based on objective selection criteria that provide for subsystem operational availability at the lowest mission cost. Suitable criteria would include robustness, safety, and the minimization of mass, volume, power, cooling, crew time, and resupply requirements for the candidate technologies. The best candidate technologies based on data from historical missions and preliminary data from the Solid Waste Processing and Resource Recovery Workshop (SWPRRW) have been evaluated for cost effectiveness in processing crew waste loads as defined by identified waste models. Both PC and biological approaches were considered for each of three missions: the ISS mission, a Mars transit mission, and a “concentrated exploration” mission for the Mars surface. Results of this analysis are consistent for all three missions considered.

Clothing supply has been examined for historical, current, and planned missions. For STS, crew clothing is stowed on the orbiter and returned to JSC for refurbishment. On Mir, clothing was supplied and then disposed of on Progress for incineration on re-entry. For ISS, the Russian laundry and 75% of the US laundry is placed on Progress for destructive re-entry. The rest of the US laundry is stowed in mesh bags and returned to earth in the Multi Purpose Logistics Module (MPLM) or in the STS middeck. For previous missions, clothing was supplied and thrown away. Supplying clothing without washing dirty clothing will be costly for long-duration missions. An on-board laundry system may reduce overall mission costs, as shown in previous, less accurate, metric studies. Some design and development of flight hardware laundry systems has been completed, such as the SBIR Phase I and Phase II study performed by UMPQUA Research Company for JSC in 1993.