Refine Your Search

Date

Date

Topic

Topic

Computer software and hardware Textile and Flexible Plastics Committee Data management

Search Results

Viewing 1 to 20 of 49
123Next >Last >>
Sort by relevance
Standard

Fiberboard Crease Bending Test
2019-10-31
CURRENT
J119_201910
This test method is designed to determine the suitability of a painted or unpainted fiberboard for application involving creasing and bending. The specific purpose of the test is to determine whether a given material, properly creased, can be bent along the impressed crease without objectionable failure on the surface of the bend.
Standard

Fiberboard Crease Bending Test
2010-05-10
HISTORICAL
J119_201005
This test method is designed to determine the suitability of a painted or unpainted fiberboard for application involving creasing and bending. The specific purpose of the test is to determine whether a given material, properly creased, can be bent along the impressed crease without objectionable failure on the surface of the bend.
Standard

Load Deflection Testing of Urethane Foams for Automotive Seating
2007-08-13
HISTORICAL
J815_200708
Traditionally, cellular foam products have been checked for load deflection by determining the load required to cause a 25% deflection. In automotive seating, on the other hand, the load deflection is checked by determining the thickness under constant force conditions to (a) indicate the initial softness of the seat cushion, (b) measure how thick the seat cushion is under the average passenger load (a measurement of padding left for “ride” and seated height), and (c) determine a value to indicate resiliency. In this method these measurements are made by determining the thickness of the seat cushion under fixed loads of 4.5 N, 110 N, and 220 N with a 323 cm2 circular indentor foot.
Standard

Load Deflection Testing of Urethane Foams for Automotive Seating
2002-10-30
HISTORICAL
J815_200210
Traditionally, cellular foam products have been checked for load deflection by determining the load required to cause a 25% deflection. In automotive seating, on the other hand, the load deflection is checked by determining the thickness under constant force conditions to (a) indicate the initial softness of the seat cushion, (b) measure how thick the seat cushion is under the average passenger load (a measurement of padding left for “ride” and seated height), and (c) determine a value to indicate resiliency. In this method these measurements are made by determining the thickness of the seat cushion under fixed loads of 4.5 N, 110 N, and 220 N with a 323 cm 2 circular indentor foot.
Standard

Load Deflection Testing of Urethane Foams for Automotive Seating
2001-12-10
HISTORICAL
J815_200112
Traditionally, cellular foam products have been checked for load deflection by determining the load required to cause a 25% deflection. In automotive seating, on the other hand, the load deflection is checked by determining the thickness under constant force conditions to (a) indicate the initial softness of the seat cushion, (b) measure how thick the seat cushion is under the average passenger load (a measurement of padding left for “ride” and seated height), and (c) determine a value to indicate resiliency. In this method these measurements are made by determining the thickness of the seat cushion under fixed loads of 4.5 N, 110 N, and 220 N with a 323 cm 2 circular indentor foot.
Standard

Test Method for Determining Blocking Resistance and Associated Characteristics of Automotive Trim Materials
2002-07-26
HISTORICAL
J912_200207
This test method is designed to indicate the degree of surface tackiness, color transfer, loss of embossment, and surface marring when two trim materials are placed face to face under specific conditions of time, temperature, and pressure. These specific conditions are not dictated in this test procedure but will be found in the material standards which govern each type of trim material to be tested.
Standard

TEST METHOD FOR DETERMINING BLOCKING RESISTANCE AND ASSOCIATED CHARACTERISTICS OF AUTOMOTIVE TRIM MATERIALS
1994-08-01
HISTORICAL
J912_199408
This test method is designed to indicate the degree of surface tackiness, color transfer, loss of embossment, and surface marring when two trim materials are placed face to face under specific conditions of time, temperature, and pressure. These specific conditions are not dictated in this test procedure but will be found in the material standards which govern each type of trim material to be tested.
Standard

Test Method for Determining Blocking Resistance and Associated Characteristics of Automotive Trim Materials
2007-11-02
HISTORICAL
J912_200711
This test method is designed to indicate the degree of surface tackiness, color transfer, loss of embossment, and surface marring when two trim materials are placed face to face under specific conditions of time, temperature, and pressure. These specific conditions are not dictated in this test procedure but will be found in the material standards which govern each type of trim material to be tested.
Standard

Test Method for Determining Blocking Resistance and Associated Characteristics of Automotive Trim Materials
2012-10-15
HISTORICAL
J912_201210
This test method is designed to indicate the degree of surface tackiness, color transfer, loss of embossment, and surface marring when two trim materials are placed face to face under specific conditions of time, temperature, and pressure. These specific conditions are not dictated in this test procedure but will be found in the material standards which govern each type of trim material to be tested.
Standard

Optical Imaging Evaluation of Impact Damage Resistance Testing on Exterior Finishes
2023-03-01
CURRENT
J2661_202303
This SAE Recommended Practice covers a procedure for evaluating plastic and multiple-layer coatings exposed to gravelometer testing (as defined in SAE J400) with an optical imaging and analysis system. The intent of the procedure is to detect, count and characterize instances of damage in the coated surface that fracture the top coat layer or penetrate through multiple layers of the coating system. It may be possible to extend this methodology of coating damage evaluation to specimens that have undergone test procedures or exposures that produce similar, discrete damage sites in the coating system. If so applied, evaluation results must be interpreted with respect to the limitations and intent implied by the original evaluation procedure and its associated rating system, if applicable.
123Next >Last >>
X