Search Results

Accident reconstructionists rarely have complete data with which to determine vehicle speed, and so the true value must be bracketed within a range. Previous work has shown the effect of friction uncertainty in determining speed from tire marks left by a vehicle in yaw. The goal of the current study was to assess improvements in the accuracy of vehicle speed estimated from yaw marks using progressively more scene and vehicle information. Data for this analysis came from staged S-turn maneuvers that in some cases led to rollover of sport utility vehicles. Initial speeds were first calculated using the critical curve speed (CCS) formula on the yaw marks from the first portion of the S-maneuver. Then computer simulations were performed with progressively more input data: i) the complete tire marks from the whole S-maneuver, ii) measured vehicle mass, iii) measured suspension stiffness and damping, and iv) measured steering history.

The accuracy of collision severity data recorded by event data recorders (EDRs) has been previously measured primarily using barrier impact data from compliance tests and experimental low-speed impacts. There has been less study of the accuracy of EDR-based collision severity data in real-world, vehicle-to-vehicle collisions. Here we used 189 real-world front-into-rear collisions from the Crash Investigating Sampling System (CISS) database where the EDR from both vehicles recorded a severity to examine the accuracy of the EDR-reported speed changes. We calculated relative error between the EDR-reported speed change of each vehicle and a speed change predicted for that same vehicle using the EDR-reported speed change of the other vehicle and conservation of momentum. We also examined the effect of vehicle-type, mass ratio, and pre-impact braking on the relative error in the speed changes.

Bicycle computers record and store global position data that can be useful for forensic investigations. The goal of this study was to estimate the absolute error of the latitude and longitude positions recorded by a common bicycle computer over a wide range of riding conditions. We installed three Garmin Edge 530 computers on the handlebars of a bicycle and acquired 9 hours of static data and 96 hours (2214 km) of dynamic data using three different navigation modes (GPS, GPS+GLONASS, and GPS+Galileo satellite systems) and two geographic locations (Vancouver, BC, Canada and Orange County, CA, USA). We used the principle of error propagation to calculate the absolute error of this device from the relative errors between the three pairs of computers. During the static tests, we found 16 m to 108 m of drift during the first 4 min and 1.4 m to 5.0 m of drift during a subsequent 8 min period. During the dynamic tests, we found a 95th percentile absolute error for this device of ±8.04 m.

Most collision reconstructions implicitly assume the same tire/road friction coefficient for all vehicles, despite evidence that friction varies between tires, surfaces, and individual trials. Here we assess the errors introduced by an assumption of a single, universal friction coefficient when reconstructing a collision where vehicles actually had different tire frictions. We used Monte Carlo methods to generate 20,000 synthetic two-vehicle impacts and rest positions using different, randomized friction coefficients for each vehicle and randomized impact speeds. These rest positions were then used to reconstruct both vehicles’ impact speeds assuming a single, common friction coefficient. High and low bounds on the impact speeds were reconstructed using high and low bounds on the common friction. We found that more than 97% of the true impact speeds were in the ranges reconstructed using upper and lower friction bounds.

Video evidence in collision reconstruction has become a common foundation for vehicle position and speed analyses. The goal of this study was to explore how the uncertainty of these position/speed analyses is affected by various camera-, scene-, and vehicle-related properties. To achieve this goal, we quantified how the size and aspect ratio of pixels in the pixel grid change as a result of correcting for lens distortion and projecting the pixel grid onto a real-world surface captured by the image. Relying on both general and case-specific examples, we used Monte Carlo analyses to explore how uncertainty can be calculated and how it varies for different measurements and different camera-, scene-, and vehicle-related properties.