On the Errors Induced By the Hookean Modelling of Nominal Stresses in the En Method

Document Number: 2001-01-4067

Date Published: March 2001

Author(s):
Marco Antonio Meggiolaro - Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-
Jaime Tupiass\au Pinho de Castro - Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-

Abstract:
The traditional eN procedures are inconsistent when modelling nominal stresses by Hooke's law and the stresses and strains at the critical notch root by Ramberg-Osgood's equation, since the material is the same at both regions. When the nominal stresses are not substantially smaller than the yielding strength S\dY, the predicted hysteresis loops at the notch root can be significantly non-conservative. In fact, when the nominal stresses are in the order of S\dY, the Hookean model can predict stresses and strains at the notch root that are smaller than the nominal ones, a clear nonsense. To avoid this problem, it is mandatory to use Ramberg-Osgood to model both the nominal and the critical stresses and strains. However, this approach is not trivial to implement, especially when complex loads are involved. In this work, the methodology required to warrant correct numerical predictions of the critical loops under high nominal loads are discussed.

File Size: 2407K
Product Status: In Stock

Purchase more technical papers and save! With TechSelect, you decide what SAE Technical Papers you need, when you need them, and how much you want to pay. Learn more >