Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award

The SAE Teetor Program stimulates contacts between younger engineering educators and practicing engineers in industry and government.

Reflecting the firm belief of its donor that engineering educators are the most effective link between engineering students and their future careers, the SAE Ralph R. Teetor Educational Fund's major program is focused on younger engineering educators. Its objective is to provide an engineering atmosphere in which these teachers can meet and exchange views with practicing engineers.

The current decade places greater expectations upon the colleges and universities of the world to educate individuals who must successfully meet the challenges that face society. The purpose of the Teetor Award is to recognize and honor those younger educators who are successfully preparing engineers for this task.

Established in 1963, this award is administered by the Teetor Educational Award Committee and consists of a framed certificate, a trip to a major SAE meeting, and two years of SAE membership. The award is presented at either WCX: World Congress Experience or at a major SAE aerospace event.

Reflecting the firm belief of its donor that early career engineering educators are the most effective link between engineering students and their future careers, the SAE Ralph R. Teetor Educational Fund's major program is focused on these engineering educators. Its objective is to provide an engineering atmosphere that these teachers can meet and exchange views with practicing engineers.

The program accomplishes this by underwriting the costs of annually bringing engineering educators to the SAE World Congress & Exposition in Detroit, Michigan, or the SAE AeroTech meeting held every other year. These events attract more than 45,000 engineers who share common interests in research, design, development, production, and utilization of land, sea, air, and space vehicles.

Besides having the freedom to attend their choice of technical sessions, the SAE Teetor Award participants are invited to attend SAE technical committee meetings, take part in visits to industrial and research facilities, and an awards ceremony. Special functions allow the group to meet with officers of SAE, as well as to get to know each other better. The participants are encouraged to tour the Exposition and to talk with as many practicing engineers as possible.

As a feature of the Award program, one of the major automobile manufacturers and one of the leading aerospace corporations are hosts-for-a-day to the participants. The host's engineering and research department customarily arrange specialized tours and sessions where new techniques are demonstrated and discussed. At other forums, views are exchanged on subjects of mutual interest to the engineering educators and the host engineers.

The Teetor Program has been an important part of the SAE service and educational story since 1963. It has provided an unparalleled opportunity for more than 800 engineering educators to develop a better understanding and closer relationship with practicing engineers. Since its inception, Teetor Award recipients have represented over 200 universities and colleges.

SAE Teetor Award Alumni continue to develop new concepts in teaching, engage in research programs, participate in local industrial-college efforts, and assist SAE Sections, thanks to their exposure to industry via this unique program. They have continued to interface with industry and government bodies by serving on the SAE Board of Directors, on administrative , executive & technical committees, and by actively supporting other educational programs administered by SAE.

The unique program has been enthusiastically welcomed by Deans of Engineering and has generated comments such as these from the participants:

  • The new challenges that industry faces has put new and higher demands on the practicing engineer. He should now be prepared to tackle previously unresolved problems in addition to finding answers to routine problems. We as engineering educators have to prepare our graduates for assuming such responsibilities. The Teetor Award Program gave us guidelines and hints that will help in our task.”
  • The Teetor Award provides an excellent opportunity for early career educators to access information about the automotive industry. The direct benefit is the ability to tie together theory and ‘real world’ in the classroom. The capability to bridge this gap results in a significantly enhanced educational experience for the student. Without the Teetor Program, I would not be able to bridge this gap as effectively.”
  • By attending the technical sessions and talking to practicing engineers, I obtained a much clearer picture of the important problems and the new frontiers in automotive technology. It also gave me a better idea of the functions of engineers in industry, which will help me to better prepare my students for their careers.”
  • Participation in the program was a most valuable experience for me. I now have a broad understanding of current industry practices and design goals that I can pass on to my classes. In addition, the program made me much more aware of the exciting research being carried out in my area of specialization.”
  • I believe the opportunity to discuss engineering education with leaders of the automotive industry was extremely valuable. I can see both engineering education and industry gaining from informal interchanges such as these.”
  • The goals of academic and industrial interchange were met with maximum benefits. Each participant will take back to hundreds of students the industrial knowledge gained as a result of this program. This was not simply attendance at a SAE annual meeting. This was truly an update of industrial contact for the professors involved.”

"A constructor of miniature dynamos and other machinery at 10 and thoroughly versed in all that pertains to their operation, and at 12 the builder of an automobile that carries him about the streets of his native town and far out upon the country roads at a speed of from 18 to 25 miles an hour, is the remarkable record of Ralph Teetor of Hagerstown, Indiana.” The foregoing is quoted from a feature article that appeared in the New York Herald of December, 21, 1902.

Ten years later Ralph R. Teetor graduated from the University of Pennsylvania with a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering. He immediately started work as a mechanical engineer for the Light Inspection Car Company, an organization founded by his family that grew through several name changes to become the Perfect Circle Company in 1928 and later the Perfect Circle Corporation. Teetor soon was named Vice President of Engineering for Perfect Circle and was the corporation’s President from 1946 to 1957. Following his Presidency he continued to be active as an Engineering Consultant and Director until his retirement.

But retirement did not mean full retirement for Teetor. He established his own workshop where he worked on new ideas for the improvement of existing products in automotive and other fields.

His SAE activities were numerous since he first affiliated in 1912. He held practically every office in the SAE Indiana Section and became its Chairman in 1926. Nationally, he participated actively in SAE’s technical and administrative committee work and, in 1936, was elected SAE President. After his successful term as President, Teetor contributed to a number of SAE research and technical committees and served on the SAE Technical Board and as Chairman of the SAE Meetings Committee, predecessor to the SAE Engineering Activity Board.

Education was one of Teetor’s important interests. In 1949 he was appointed to the Board of Trustees of Earlham College and continued until his death in 1982. He received honorary degrees from Earlham College and the Indiana Institute of Technology.

Teetor believed that “the success of our future society depends on the emphasis we place on teaching to our youth the basic principles that have been proven by experience to be sound.” In making the gift that made possible the establishment of the SAE Ralph R. Teetor Educational Fund, Teetor designated that the money was to be used to further SAE’s educational program. he suggested that consideration be given to “the possibilities of projects that will encourage extension of acquaintanceships and interchange of needed information between practicing engineers in industry with faculty, students, and junior engineers.” The Ralph R. Teetor Educational Awards Committee has taken this suggestion as its objective.

Applicants must:

  • Be an early career engineering educator with more than three, but less than 10 years of full-time faculty experience, immediately following completion of the terminal degree, M.S. or PhD, at the date of application
  • Be affiliated with an engineering school accredited by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) or a school from which SAE accepts student members
  • Complete the application and submit all required documentation to SAE by November 1

Judging and Criteria

A board of judges comprised of both academic and industry personnel will review the material and select the participants in November. Outstanding educators will be chosen from the ground vehicle category and from the aerospace category. The judges will base their selection on the following criteria:

  • Contributions to teaching and curriculum development
  • Contributions to research, including grants, independent research and professional development
  • Publications related to SAE mobility interests
  • Applicant's education, leadership in student activities, and participation in engineering society activities
  • Applicant's three support letters
  • Benefits anticipated from participation in the Teetor program

Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award Recipients




John Bachman, Ph.D., California State University LA
Trevor Elliott, Ph.D., University of Tennessee Chattanooga
Ben Lawler, Ph.D., Clemson University


Pingen Chen, PhD., Tennesse Technological University
Kevin Disotell, Ph.D., The Ohio State University
Ala Qattawi, Ph.D., University of Toledo
Stephanie Stockar, Ph.D., The Ohio State University


Jennifer Bastiaan, Ph.D., Kettering University
Yan Chen, Ph.D., Arizona State University
Yunyi Jia, Ph.D., Clemson University
Darrell Robinette, Ph.D., Michigan Technological University
Senthilkumar Sundararaj, Ph.D., SRM Institute of Science


Tanvir Farouk, PhD
Diane Peters, PhD
Xiao Hu, PhD
Xinjie Zhang, PhD



Sage Kokjohn, PhD
Yannis Korkolis, PhD
Todd Lowe, PhD
Simona Onori, PhD
C. David Remy, PhD
Subith Vasu, PhD
Bret Windom, PhD
Hui Zhang, PhD


Casey Allen, PhD
Emmanuel DeMoor, PhD
Chris Hagen, PhD
Michael Keller, PhD
Jason Martz, PhD
Srikanth Pilla, PhD
Robert Prucka, PhD


Fadi Abu Farha, PhD
Marcello Canova, PhD
William Northrop, PhD
Chinedum Okwudire, PhD
Mahdi Shahbakhti, PhD
Elisa Toulson, PhD
George Youssef, PhD


Caroline Genzale
Kasi Kamalakkannan
Lin Ma
Andrea Strzelec
Lesley Wright


Beshah Ayalew
Diana Lados
Rasim Guldiken, Ph.D., University of South Florida
Liping Liu
Andres Tovar
Lei Zuo


Prof. Jeongmin Ahn, PhD
Melody L. Baglione
Thomas Bradley
Prof. Sanghoon Kook
Tie Li
David A. Rothamer
Prof. Gregory Matthew Shaver, PhD
Donald J. Siegel


Shorya Awtar
Jeremy Daily
Christopher Depcik
Prof. James W. Gregory
Marcis Jansons
Heejung Jung
Pierre Mertiny, PhD
Scott A. Miers
Prof. Junmin Wang, PhD
James Yang


Dr. Christina Lieselotte Carmen, PhD
Timothy John Jacobs
Prof. Laine Mears PE
Dr. David R Mikesell PE
C D Naiju
Dr. Gregory M Odegard
Prof. Matthew Oehlschlaeger
R Rajendran
Tobias Rossmann
Dr. Christopher Schuh
Zongxuan Sun
Xia Wang, PhD
Prof. Nadir Yilmaz, PhD


George Delagrammatikas
Andrew Gouldstone
Alireza Khaligh
Tonghun Lee
Prof. Y Charles Lu
Dr. Matthew Thomas Siniawski
Thirumalini Subramaniam


Jeffrey S. Allen
Bradford A. Bruno, PhD
Scott Goldsborough
Prof. Dennis W. Hong
Prof. Dimitrios C. Kyritsis
Dr. Thomas E. Lacy Jr.
Matt Parkinson, PhD
Prof. David P. Schmidt
Prof. Joshua David Summers
Dr. Azer Yalin


Avinash Kumar Agarwal
Dr. Janet Brelin-Fornari
Prof Sean N. Brennan
Babak Fahimi
Dr-Ing Mark F Horstemeyer
Prof. Robert W Hyers
Richard W. Kent
Dr. Daniel R Kirk
Dr. Song-Charng Kong
Jeffrey Naber
Taehyun Shim
Prof. Zahed Siddique
Steven J. Skerlos
Craig A Woolsey


Nomination Deadline: November 1

Download Nomination Form