Performance Comparison Between Chain and Belt Cam-Drive Systems 2001-01-0365
Cam-drive system performance was experimentally evaluated between chain and belt drive systems. The production Ford Duratec 3.0L 4-valve engine that is chain drive system was used as a reference and it was retrofitted with the belt drive system. The performance differences between the two systems were compared by observing the cam-drive system NVH, difference in power-loss and drive efficiency.
The experimental study showed significant advantage of the belt cam-drive system in the NVH measurement, and this showed an average of 2-3 dBA improvement in the overall sound pressure level. There were more significant NVH improvements when observing the sound pressure level in the meshing order when comparing the belt cam-drive system to the chain drive system. Additionally, the comparison between the chain and belt cam-drive systems revealed a drive torque efficiency improvement of 1% to 1.25% in the average for the belt cam-drive system.
Citation: Oh, K., Plauman, M., Romanick, J., Farmer, I. et al., "Performance Comparison Between Chain and Belt Cam-Drive Systems," SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0365, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-0365. Download Citation
Author(s):
Kyoyul Oh, Matthew Plauman, Jerry Romanick, Ian Farmer, Michael Aimone, David Barnaby
Affiliated:
The Gates Rubber Company, Worldwide Power Transmission Division, Ford Motor Company
Pages: 8
Event:
SAE 2001 World Congress
ISSN:
0148-7191
e-ISSN:
2688-3627
Also in:
Advanced Engine, Powerplant, and Component Design-SP-1620
Due to current capacity constraints, printed versions of our publications - including standards, technical papers, EDGE Reports, scholarly journal articles, books, and paint chips - may experience shipping delays of up to four to six weeks. We apologize for any inconvenience.
We also recommend:
TECHNICAL PAPER
Serpentine Accessory Belt Drive Tool: Virtual Prototyping for V-Ribbed Belt Drives
