Browse Publications Technical Papers 2010-01-1903
2010-10-05

A Comparison of a Semi-Active Inerter and a Semi-Active Suspension 2010-01-1903

Inerters have become a hot topic in recent years, especially in vehicle, train, and building suspension systems. The performance of a passive inerter and a semi-active inerter was analyzed and compared with each other and it showed that the semi-active inerter has much better performance than the passive inerter, especially with the Hybrid control method. Eight different layouts of suspensions were analyzed with a quarter car model in this paper. The adaptation of dimensionless parameters was considered for a semi-active suspension and the semi-active inerters. The performance of the semi-active inerter suspensions with different layouts was compared with a semi-active suspension with a conventional parallel spring-damper arrangement. It shows a semi-active suspension, with more simple configuration and lower cost, has similar or better compromise between ride and handling than a semi-active inerter with the Hybrid control. A semi-active inerter performs its best with ‘Layout s6’, ‘Layout s8’ or ‘Layout s9’ under the Skyhook or Groundhook, depending on the desired performance.

SAE MOBILUS

Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content. Learn More »

Access SAE MOBILUS »

Members save up to 18% off list price.
Login to see discount.
Special Offer: Download multiple Technical Papers each year? TechSelect is a cost-effective subscription option to select and download 12-100 full-text Technical Papers per year. Find more information here.
We also recommend:
TECHNICAL PAPER

High-power High-speed Road Train System

2003-01-3380

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

Power Train Selection for Optimum Performance and Efficiency

780961

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

Effect of Heavy Vehicle Suspension Designs on Dynamic Road Loading – A Comparative Study

2001-01-2766

View Details

X