Browse Publications Technical Papers 2013-01-1254

Computational Prediction of a Vehicle Aerodynamics Using Detached Eddy Simulation 2013-01-1254

In the present paper, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of the aerodynamics of a station wagon using DES (Detached Eddy Simulation), based on the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model, are discussed and compared with experimental results. DES is a non-zonal hybrid turbulence model that uses both Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and Large Eddy Simulation (LES), enabling a better equilibrium between the accurateness and the computational cost of the solution.
Simulations were run in parallel using the commercial software ANSYS/FLUENT v13.0, and required a computational grid of approximately 50 million cells. Some flow characteristics such as boundary layer separation, recirculation zones, and the entire pressure and velocity field were also obtained and analyzed. Computational results of drag force were compared with experimental results based on the SAE J1263 recommended practice (which describes a way to calculate the resistive loads that act on a vehicle during non- forced deceleration). Changes were made in the experimental estimation of the drag force, compared to the procedure stated in SAE J1263 (e.g., a differential formulation of the system was used, and the mass of the vehicle was altered by loading extra bodies into the vehicle). A selection among different sets of experimental conditions (vehicle velocities and vehicle weights) was made to improve the accuracy of the prediction.
Even though computational and experimental approaches involved different models and simplifications, results from each of them showed a fair agreement. Congruence was driven by the iterative improvements made on the boundary conditions and meshing parameters on the CFD approach, and the careful experimental design performed. The aerodynamic drag coefficient calculated by CFD was of 0.460 compared to 0.404 when calculated by experimental means, which represents a 13.8% difference or 56 drag counts.


Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content. Learn More »


Members save up to 16% off list price.
Login to see discount.
We also recommend:

Aerodynamic Investigation of Cooling Drag of a Production Sedan Part 2: CFD Results


View Details


Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of an SUV in early Development Stage using a Response Surface Method


View Details


Simulation of Flow Control Devices in Support of Vehicle Drag Reduction


View Details