Comparison of Rear Impact Crash Reconstructions to Event Data
Recorders in the Crash Investigation Sampling System Database 2022-01-5069
This article compares the results of automotive accident reconstructions to event
data recorder (EDR) data from vehicles involved in rear-end collisions. Accident
reconstructions in the Crash Investigation Sampling System (CISS) database
calculate crash severity expressed as the impact-related change in velocity
(delta-V) experienced by a vehicle. The accuracy of the CISS-reconstructed
delta-V in rear impacts was assessed by comparison to the delta-V recorded
during the crash by the EDR on board the rear-ended vehicles. The CISS database
was searched for single rear impact cases with a CISS-reconstructed delta-V as
well as an EDR download. A total of 256 cases met these criteria. On average,
the CISS-reconstructed delta-V was 4.0% lower than the delta-V recorded by the
EDR. The accuracy of the CISS reconstructions varied with crash configuration,
vehicle type, collision partner, and crash severity. Crash severity had the
largest effect on accuracy, with low-speed reconstructions overestimating the
EDR delta-V by 36% on average.
Citation: Watson, R., Cormier, J., Bonugli, E., and Greenston, M., "Comparison of Rear Impact Crash Reconstructions to Event Data Recorders in the Crash Investigation Sampling System Database," SAE Technical Paper 2022-01-5069, 2022, https://doi.org/10.4271/2022-01-5069. Download Citation
Author(s):
Richard Watson, Joseph Cormier, Enrique Bonugli, Mathew Greenston
Affiliated:
Biodynamic Research Corporation, Biocore
Pages: 9
Event:
Automotive Technical Papers
ISSN:
0148-7191
e-ISSN:
2688-3627
Related Topics:
Event data recorders
Accident reconstruction
Rear-end crashes
Crashes
SAE MOBILUS
Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content.
Learn More »