1958-01-01

LOOP SCAVENGING versus THROUGH SCAVENGING of TWO-STROKE ENGINES 580044

THIS paper reports the latest investigation of the relative merits of loop scavenging versus through scavenging. The authors hope that the conditions of the work permitted an objective evaluation of the two types of engines.
The results of the study may be summarized as follows:
  1. 1.
    With symmetrical timing, neither cylinder shows significant advantage in trapping efficiency.
  2. 2.
    With symmetrical timing, the best ratio of exhaust-port to inlet-port effective area seems to be about 0.6.
  3. 3.
    Unsymmetrical timing is an effective method of improving trapping efficiency.
  4. 4.
    The value of net indicated fuel economy shows no significant difference between the two cylinders.
The authors point out that because the areas were equal it is unlikely that the optimum port design of each type was used in comparing the cylinders. If optimum porting had been used, the two types might have shown more difference.

SAE MOBILUS

Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content. Learn More »

Access SAE MOBILUS »

Members save up to 18% off list price.
Login to see discount.
Special Offer: Download multiple Technical Papers each year? TechSelect is a cost-effective subscription option to select and download 12-100 full-text Technical Papers per year. Find more information here.
We also recommend:
TECHNICAL PAPER

Correlation of an Alternative Method for the Prediction of Engine Performance Characteristics with Measured Data

930501

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

Features of an Atkinson Two-Stroke Engine

941682

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

Three-Dimensional CFD Analysis of Semi-Direct Injection Hydraulic Free Piston Engine

2016-01-1018

View Details

X