1967-02-01

On the Question of M Incentive Contracting 670679

The authors try to answer the question, “Are the methods of M (maintainability) demonstration sufficiently developed at this date to make M incentive contracting practical?”
To answer the question the authors review and critique the M demonstration methods in vogue today. Seriously questioned are the present statistical techniques for reducing M demonstration test data.
The authors agree that sufficient field maintenance data exist to confirm that field times-to-repair of electronic and electromechanical equipment are best fitted by a log-normal curve; but point out that from their experience one can expect the times-to-repair observed during an M demonstration test to be normally distributed. Principally for this reason, the authors suggest that the Md TTR (median-time-to-repair) is a more suitable M index than the MTTR (mean-time-to-repair) for contracting purposes.
The point is made that variations in the observed Md TTR will exist from one demonstration test to another and from the demonstration test to the field experience, but that these variations are more likely due to human factors than to equipment factors. Four causes for these variations are traced to differences in repairmen skills, experience, learning and motivation. To cope with some of the variations, some coarse correction factors for the demonstration test data are given even though the authors admit that much more study and development are necessary to achieve the accuracy required for making M incentive contracting practical.

SAE MOBILUS

Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content. Learn More »

Access SAE MOBILUS »

Members save up to 18% off list price.
Login to see discount.
Special Offer: Download multiple Technical Papers each year? TechSelect is a cost-effective subscription option to select and download 12-100 full-text Technical Papers per year. Find more information here.

Due to current capacity constraints, printed versions of our publications - including standards, technical papers, EDGE Reports, scholarly journal articles, books, and paint chips - may experience shipping delays of up to four to six weeks. We apologize for any inconvenience.
We also recommend:
TECHNICAL PAPER

Global Regulation Goals and Gaps: Overview and Analysis of the International Harmonization of Automobile Standards

2005-01-1940

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

The Eyellipse and Considerations in the Driver’s Forward Field of View - Part 1

680105

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

ODEEP - Open Dependable Electrical and Electronics Platform – Concept and Projects

2005-01-1284

View Details

X