1990-02-01

Frontal Offset Crash Testing for Approx. 15 Years: Results, Experiences and Consequences 900413

The majority of real world frontal collisions involve only partial overlap of the vehicle front. Both, the resulting car deformations and the occupant loadings cannot be simulated with an impact against a flat or an angled (i.e. 30 degrees) barrier, even with an impact speed of 35 mph. As a consequence, safety engineers at Mercedes-Benz have established an adequate offset crash test with 40% barrier overlap. The effectiveness of offset design is demonstrated by means of numerous critical and realistical offset crash tests, such as impact with 40% and 25 % barrier overlap, impact against a pole (20% overlap) or car-to-car collisions (approx. 50% overlap). It is evident that further improvements in car design, in particular with respect to its effectiveness in real world accidents, can only be induced by offset testing. Since the predominant goal of offset-design is to stiffen the passenger compartment, offset design is not in conflict with compatibility (equivalent to avoiding aggressiveness) in car-to-car collisions. Further improvements might be achieved with respect to inducing glance-off effects and a further reduction of injuries to the feet. Therefore, suitability of both, test methods and injury criteria should be improved.

SAE MOBILUS

Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content. Learn More »

Access SAE MOBILUS »

Members save up to 18% off list price.
Login to see discount.
Special Offer: Download multiple Technical Papers each year? TechSelect is a cost-effective subscription option to select and download 12-100 full-text Technical Papers per year. Find more information here.
We also recommend:
TECHNICAL PAPER

Safety Performance of Passenger Cars Designed to Accommodate Frontal impacts with Partial Barrier Overlap

890748

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

The Rationale and Development of the Offset Deformable Frontal Impact Test Procedure

950501

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

Frontal Crash Tests - A Comparison of Methods

942228

View Details

X