1995-02-01

Comparison Between Lean-Burn and Stoichiometric Technologies for CNG Heavy-Duty Engines 950057

Natural gas is a viable alternative fuel to obtain low exhaust emissions. A heavy duty DI Diesel engine was converted to Otto cycle natural gas operation. Two alternative solutions were compared:
  • lean-burn technology;
  • stoichiometric feed with three-way catalyst and EGR.
Power and efficiency were similar for the two above solutions, and exhaust temperature resulted similar to the diesel engine in both cases due to the diluted operation.
The lean bum engine met EURO II ECE-R49 limits except for total hydrocarbons. Stoichiometric engine emissions resulted much lower than the limits. Particulate emissions were quite negligible for the two solutions.

SAE MOBILUS

Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content. Learn More »

Access SAE MOBILUS »

Members save up to 18% off list price.
Login to see discount.
Special Offer: Download multiple Technical Papers each year? TechSelect is a cost-effective subscription option to select and download 12-100 full-text Technical Papers per year. Find more information here.
We also recommend:
TECHNICAL PAPER

Reduction of NOx in the Exhaust Gases of an Automotive Engine Using Methane Gas by Water Injection in the Inlet Manifold

911738

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

Development of a Heavy Duty On-Highway Natural Gas-Fueled Engine

922362

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

Effects of EGR and Early Injection of Diesel Fuel on Combustion Characteristics and Exhaust Emissions in a Methane Dual Fuel Engine

2002-01-2723

View Details

X