1995-07-01

An Assessment of In Situ Propellant Production for Low Cost Mars Sample Return 951733

Recent concepts for returning sample material from Mars have identified many low-cost approaches. The intention of this study is to create an even playing field for comparison of alternative methods for implementing a Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission focusing on impacts from recent advances in Mars ISPP technologies and accounting for recent spacecraft performance advances. First, trajectories are presented for each of three options: 1) Mars Orbital Rendezvous (MOR), 2) Direct Entry/Direct Return using advanced propulsion (DR-AdvPrp), and 3) Direct Entry/Direct Return using ISPP (DR-ISPP). Next, an assessment of the state-of-the-art for current Mars ISPP technologies is used to compare alternative ISPP systems. Flight system designs were developed attempting to represent a consistent level of technology for all MSR options and then used to compare injected masses for the ISPP system options. The ISPP system with the lowest injected mass is then carried into a cost comparison with the other two MSR options (MOR and DR-AdvPrp). Results suggest the ISPP implementation for MSR should be considered the current baseline approach on the basis of lowest life cycle cost.

SAE MOBILUS

Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content. Learn More »

Access SAE MOBILUS »

Members save up to 18% off list price.
Login to see discount.
Special Offer: Download multiple Technical Papers each year? TechSelect is a cost-effective subscription option to select and download 12-100 full-text Technical Papers per year. Find more information here.
We also recommend:
TECHNICAL PAPER

NASA / SATS Life Cycle Cost Model

2000-01-1690

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

A Systems Approach to Aviation Safety: FAA Comments on Design for Regulatory Complianec-A Safety System

760504

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

Applying Design-To-Life Cycle Cost Methods During Engine Advanced Development

781030

View Details

X