Thoracic Injury Mechanisms and Biomechanical Responses in Lateral Velocity Pulse Impacts 99SC04

The purpose of this study is to help understand the thoracic response and injury mechanisms in high-energy, limited-stroke, lateral velocity pulse impacts to the human chest wall. To impart such impacts, a linear impactor was developed which had a limited stroke and minimally decreased velocity during impact. The peak impact velocity was 5.6 ± 0.3 m/s.
A series of BioSID and cadaver tests were conducted to measure biomechanical response and injury data. The conflicting effects of padding on increased deflection and decreased acceleration were demonstrated in tests with BioSID and cadavers. The results of tests conducted on six cadavers were used to test several proposed injury criteria for side impact. Linear regression was used to correlate each injury criterion to the number of rib fractures.
This test methodology captured and supported a contrasting trend of increased chest deflection and decreased TTI when padding was introduced. This study suggested that chest deflection or the energy generated in a lateral velocity pulse impact, correlated with the number of rib fractures better than acceleration or the viscous response of the struck-side rib cage. Interestingly, Favg*Cmax, TTI*Cmax and peak spine acceleration (T12-y) also correlated well with the number of rib fractures. The hypothesis for injury assessment using energy concept, Maximum Stored Energy Criterion (SEC), also was supported by the BioSID and cadaver test results.


Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content. Learn More »


Members save up to 18% off list price.
Login to see discount.
Special Offer: Download multiple Technical Papers each year? TechSelect is a cost-effective subscription option to select and download 12-100 full-text Technical Papers per year. Find more information here.
We also recommend:

A Statistical Analysis of 28,000 Accident Cases with Emphasis on Occupant Restraint Value


View Details


Statistical Simulations to Evaluate the Methods of the Construction of Injury Risk Curves


View Details


ES-2 Dummy Biomechanical Responses


View Details