This course is verified by Probitas Authentication as meeting the AS9104/3A requirements for continuing Professional Development. In the Aerospace Industry there is a focus on Defect Prevention to ensure that quality goals are met. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) and Control Plan activities are recognized as being one of the most effective, on the journey to Zero Defects. This two-day course is designed to explain the core tools of Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (DFMEA), Process Flow Diagrams, Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) and Control Plans as described in AS13100 and RM13004.
Despite being ubiquitous elements in aerospace structures, thin cylindrical shells’ catastrophic buckling response under axial compression has still remained an enigma. The recent advancements in theoretical and numerical studies aided in realising the role of localisation in shell buckling. However, the buckling being instantaneous made it unfeasible for the experimental observations to corroborate the numerical results. This necessitates high-fidelity shell buckling experiments using full-filed measurement techniques. Cut-outs are deliberate and inevitable geometrical imperfections in actual structures that could dictate the buckling response. Additive manufacturing makes it feasible to fabricate shells with tailored imperfections and study various conceivable designs.
The Selective Laser Melting (SLM) process is employed in high-precision layer-by-layer Additive Manufacturing (AM) on powder bed and aims to fabricate high-quality structural components. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the process and its optimization, both modeling and simulation in conjunction with extensive experimental studies along with laser calibration studies have been attempted. Multiscale and multi-physics-based simulations have the potential to bring out a new level of insight into the complex interaction of laser melting, solidification, and defect formation in the SLM parts. SLM process encompasses various physical phenomena during the formation of metal parts, starting with laser beam incidence and heat generation, heat transfer, melt/fluid flow, phase transition, and microstructure solidification. To effectively model this Multiphysics problem, it is imperative to consider different scales and compatible boundary conditions in the simulations.
In applications demanding high performance under extreme conditions of pressure and temperature, a range of Mechanically Attached Fittings (MAFs) is offered by various Multinational Corporations (MNCs). These engineered fittings have been innovatively designed to meet the rigorous requirements of the aerospace industry, offering a cost-effective and lightweight alternative to traditional methods such as brazing, welding, or other mechanically attached tube joints. One prominent method employed for attaching these fittings to tubing is through Internal Swaging, a mechanical technique. This process involves the outward formation of rigid tubing into grooves within the fitting. One of the methods with which this intricate operation is achieved is by using a drawbolt - expander assembly within an elastomeric swaging machine.
Selective Laser Melting (SLM) has gained widespread usage in aviation, aerospace, and die manufacturing due to its exceptional capacity for producing intricate metal components of highly complex geometries. Nevertheless, the instability inherent in the SLM process frequently results in irregularities in the quality of the fabricated components. As a result, this hinders the continuous progress and wider acceptance of SLM technology. Addressing these challenges, in-process quality control strategies during SLM operations have emerged as effective remedies for mitigating the quality inconsistencies found in the final components. This study focuses on utilizing optical emission spectroscopy and IR thermography to continuously monitor and analyze the SLM process within the powder bed, with the aim of strengthening process control and minimizing defects.
Electromechanical actuators (EMAs) play a crucial role in aircraft electrification, offering advantages in terms of aircraft-level weight, rigging and reliability compared to hydraulic actuators. To prevent backdriving, skewed roller braking devices called "no-backs" are employed to provide braking torque. These technology components are continuing to be improved with analysis driven design innovations eg. U.S. Pat. No. 8,393,568. The no-back mechanism has the rollers skewed around their own transverse axis that allow for a combination of rolling and sliding against the stator surfaces. This friction provides the necessary braking torque that prevents the backdriving. By controlling the friction radius and analyzing the Hertzian contact stresses, the brake can be sized for the desired duty cycle. No-backs can be configured to provide braking torque for both tensile and compressive backdriving loads.