Search Results

Third generation advanced high strength steels (3GAHSS) are increasingly used in automotive for light weighting and safety body structure components. However, high material strength usually introduces higher springback that affects the dimensional accuracy. The ability to accurately predict springback in simulations is very important to reduce time and cost in stamping tool and process design. In this work, tension and compression tests were performed and the results were implemented to generate Isotropic/Kinematic hardening (I/KH) material models on a 3GAHSS steel with 980 MPa minimum tensile strength. Systematic material model parametric studies and evaluations have been conducted. Case studies from full-scale industrial parts are provided and the predicted springback results are compared to the measured springback data. Key variables affecting the springback prediction accuracy are identified.

Commercially available Generation 3 (GEN3) advanced high strength steels (AHSS) have inherent capability of replacing press hardened steels (PHS) using cold stamping processes. 980 GEN3 AHSS is a cold stampable steel with 980 MPa minimum tensile strength that exhibits an excellent combination of formability and strength. Hot forming of PHS requires elevated temperatures (> 800°C) to enable complex deep sections. 980 GEN3 AHSS presents similar formability as 590 DP material, allowing engineers to design complex geometries similar to PHS material; however, its cold formability provides implied potential process cost savings in automotive applications. The increase in post-forming yield strength of GEN3 AHSS due to work and bake hardening contributes strongly toward crash performance in energy absorption and intrusion resistance.