Search Results

The US EPA and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) require electric vehicle range to be determined according to the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) surface vehicle recommended practice J1634 - Battery Electric Vehicle Energy Consumption and Range Test Procedure. In the 2021 revision of the SAE J1634, the Short Multi-Cycle Test (SMCT) was introduced. The proposed testing protocol eases the chassis dynamometer test burden by performing a 2.1-hour drive cycle on the dynamometer, followed by discharging the remaining battery energy into a battery cycler to determine the Useable Battery Energy (UBE). Opting for a cycler-based discharge is financially advantageous due to the extended operating time required to fully deplete a 70-100kWh battery commonly found in Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs).

Low voltage hybridization (<60 V) supports engine start/stop, regenerative braking, and constrained torque assist/regeneration at a low cost. This work studies the potential benefits of a novel hybrid system, called a power split supercharger (PSS). A 9 kW motor is shared between boosting the engine or providing hybrid functionalities, allowing it to couple with a small engine and still support good acceleration. However, the PSS operation is limited to only one of the parallel hybrid or boosting modes at each time instance. In this work an equivalent consumption minimization strategy (ECMS) is developed to select the PSS mode and the motor torque during hybrid mode. The PSS operation is simulated over standard EPA drive cycles with an engine mean value model that captures detailed air path and PSS dynamics.

This study uses full drive cycle simulation to compare the fuel consumption of a vehicle with a turbocharged (TC) engine to the same vehicle with an alternative boosting technology, namely, a hybrid supercharger, in which a planetary gear mechanism governs the power split to the supercharger between the crankshaft and a 48 V 5 kW electric motor. Conventional mechanically driven superchargers or electric superchargers have been proposed to improve the dynamic response of boosted engines, but their projected fuel efficiency benefit depends heavily on the engine transient response and driver/cycle aggressiveness. The fuel consumption benefits depend on the closed-loop engine responsiveness, the control tuning, and the torque reserve needed for each technology. To perform drive cycle analyses, a control strategy is designed that minimizes the boost reserve and employs high rates of combustion dilution via exhaust gas recirculation (EGR).