Search Results

Elastokinematic parameters of the axle stiffness are one of the important effects for vehicle dynamics, which are usually considered in full-vehicle real-time models. In order to integrate such effects into real-time models, a multibody axle model is placed on the suspension test rig and is clamped at mounting points. Statically defined load cases are applied on the wheel, and finally, lookup tables are generated, which represent the elastokinematics for the real-time environment. In this case, the Body-In-White (BIW) is considered to be ideally stiff. However, the elasticity of BIW significantly influences the elastokinematics behavior as well and should be integrated into real-time models. The present paper introduces an efficient approach to integrate the BIW compliance effects into lookup tables in addition to the suspension stiffness under consideration of the Elastokinematics By Inertia Force method (EBIF method).

In order to reduce development cost and time, frontloading is an established methodology for automotive development programs. With this approach, particular development tasks are shifted to earlier program phases. One prerequisite for this approach is the application of Hardware-in-the-Loop test setups. Hardware-in-the-Loop methodologies have already successfully been applied to conventional as well as electrified powertrains considering various driving scenarios. Regarding driving performance and energy demand, electrified powertrains are highly dependent on the dc-link voltage. However, there is a particular shortage of studies focusing on the verification of variable dc-link voltage controls by Hardware-in-the-Loop setups. This article is intended to be a first step towards closing this gap. Thereto, a Hardware-in-the-Loop setup of a battery electric vehicle is developed.

The growing number of passenger car variants and derivatives in all global markets, their high degree of software differentiability caused by regionally different legislative regulations, as well as pronounced market-specific customer expectations require a continuous optimization of the entire vehicle development process. In addition, ever stricter emission standards lead to a considerable increase in powertrain hardware and control complexity. Also, efforts to achieve market and brand specific multistep adjustable drivability characteristics as unique selling proposition, rapidly extend the scope for calibration and testing tasks during the development of powertrain control units. The resulting extent of interdependencies between the drivability calibration and other development and calibration tasks requires frontloading of development tasks.