Search Results

A common rail injection system was applied to port-loop and uniflow scavenged two-stroke DI-Diesel engines. While the uniflow scavenged configuration was operated with a swirl level comparable to that of 4-stroke DI-Diesel engines, no swirl motion was realized with the port-loop scavenged arrangement. The results show that, in spite of disadvantages in the mixture formation process, the high mixture formation energy observed with the common rail injection makes a swirl-free Diesel combustion possible. However, at part load the combustion process and emission level with the port-loop scavenged engine is not satisfactory. At full load, disadvantages in the scavenging process are observed in addition to the poorer mixture formation with the loop scavenged two-stroke concept. Consequently, the expected specific power output of the port-loop scavenged arrangement is with 20 kW/l far lower than about 45 kW/l predicted for the uniflow scavenged engine.

In conjunction with throttle-free load control on a 4-valve, single-cylinder spark-ignition engine, the influencing variables of charge cycle, mixture formation and combustion process are presented both as computer calculations and on the basis of test results. The influences of the position of the maximum of the inlet valve stroke, the position of the inlet close, the shape of the valve stroke and the load motion in relation to the maximum power and minimum fuel consumption are investigated in full load by computer calculations and in partial load by engine tests.