Refine Your Search

Search Results

Standard

Certificate of Conformance Requirements

2020-03-13
WIP
AS9163
This document provides harmonized process and documentation requirements for the establishment of Certificates of Conformance (CoC) used to attest the conformity of aviation, space, and defense products. It includes a template and indications about how to complete it. Requirements for the establishment of Authorised Release Certificates (e.g. EASA Form 1, FAA 8130-3 tag, etc.) by a supplier holding a Production Approval (for new products in production or spares) or Maintenance Approval (for in service repairs and after sales overhaul activities) are not covered by this document as applicable rules are those defined by the Aviation Authorities having granted the Production Approval. Note: When quoted by the Customer in a contractual requirement, application of this document is mandatory.
Standard

Unsalvageable Parts Initiative

2015-02-24
WIP
AS9147
Parts that are declared as unsalvageable are difficult to trace from the workshop to the destruction/recycling area
Standard

Guidance for the Application of AQAP 2110 within a 9100 Quality Management System

2014-04-25
WIP
ARP9137A
This document has been prepared and issued to provide information and guidance on the application of AQAP 2110 when the Supplier adheres to the provisions of 9100. This document is published as AQAP 2009 Annex F and 9137. It was jointly developed by NATO and industry representatives for use by NATO and industry to facilitate the use and understanding of the relationship between the AQAP 2110 and 9100.
Standard

Direct Ship - Recommended Practices for Aerospace Companies

2002-04-08
HISTORICAL
ARP9004
Limited to the Aerospace industry where an approved manufacturer requests a supplier to ship an article against the approved manufacturer’s quality system directly to a customer. The direct ship process is not required or applicable to standard parts or military parts. In this process the approved manufacturer is responsible for assurance that the article conforms to Type Design information.
Standard

Statistical Product Acceptance Requirements Using Process Control Methods

2005-10-27
HISTORICAL
ARP9013/3
ARP9013/3 recommended practice specifies a product acceptance system using process control methods. Its purpose is to assure conformance for specified characteristics. Use of process control techniques for product acceptance requires maintaining process stability and capability. A stable and capable process is the best assurance of conforming hardware for the customer. There can be lower inspection costs associated with a process control acceptance approach.
Standard

Aerospace Operator Self-Verification Programs

2004-03-24
HISTORICAL
ARP9062
Operator Self-Verification can apply to a variety of processes. The primary focus is on traditional manufacturing operations, but applications can be made wherever traditional inspection methods are employed. The practices recommended in this document are intended to identify the basic elements for structuring Operator Self-Verification programs within the aerospace industry; applicable to producers of commercial and military aircraft and weapons platforms, space vehicles, and all related hardware, software, electronics, engines and composite components. Operator Self-Verification programs are applied to improve overall efficiency and product quality to processes considered mature, as judged by the organization. Operator Self-Verification programs are not stand-alone processes, but augment existing quality management system standard requirements.
Standard

Requirements for Development, Implementation and Control of an Aerospace Auditor Training

2001-06-01
HISTORICAL
AIR5493
This document shall be applied by accreditation bodies, registrars and other providers of training for the instruction of auditors or other professionals for specialization for the aerospace industry per the requirements of AIR5359. Additionally, this document applies to all organizations qualifying Aerospace Auditors in support of Aerospace Quality Systems standards AS9000 and AS9100.
Standard

Requirements for Registration of Quality Systems to AS9000 or AS9100

2001-07-01
HISTORICAL
AIR5359A
These requirements are applicable to Accreditation Bodies, Registrars and OEMs, when specified by an aerospace company requiring assessment and/or registration of their quality system in accordance with the requirements of this document. The quality management system standard shall be AS9000 or AS9100 and shall be applied to the organization’s complete Quality System that covers aerospace products.
Standard

Aerospace Operator Self-Verification Programs

2005-05-10
HISTORICAL
ARP9162
The focus of Operator Self-Verification is on traditional manufacturing operations, and applications can be made wherever traditional inspection is employed. The practices recommended in this document are intended to identify the basic elements and provide a “guideline” for structuring Operator Self-Verification programs within the aerospace industry; applicable to producers of commercial and military aircraft and weapons platforms, space vehicles, and all related hardware, software, electronics, engines and composite components. Operator Self-Verification programs are applied to improve the overall efficiency and product quality of processes considered mature, as judged by the implementing organization. Operator Self-Verification programs are not stand-alone processes, but augment existing quality management systems.
Standard

Quality Management Systems – Requirements for Aviation, Space and Defense Organizations – Non-Deliverable Software (Supplement to 9100:2016)

2020-09-16
WIP
AS9115/2
Non-deliverable software is defined as software that facilitates the design, development, manufacture, inspection, test, acceptance, or calibration of a deliverable product, and is not generally delivered under a contract. This may include deliverable services software such as but not limited to maintenance procedures, order processing and/or various types of online technical support resources. As Industry efforts increase to improve product quality and reliability and reduce production costs, use of computer software programs for automation, control and monitoring of production processes and product test, acceptance and calibration is also increasing. It is therefore vital to assure these software programs are controlled to ensure product conformity requirements are properly supported.
Standard

Direct Delivery Authorization Guidance for Aerospace Companies

2005-09-09
HISTORICAL
ARP9107
Limited to the Commercial Aerospace industry where a request is made for a Production Organization (PO) to have Direct Delivery Authorization (DDA), which includes an Appropriate Arrangement (AA) between the PO and the Design Organization (DO). In this process the DO is responsible for ensuring the continuous updating of design and airworthiness data to the PO, whilst the PO is responsible for assurance that the manufactured article conforms to Approved Design and Airworthiness Data. The PO is responsible to provide airworthiness release documentation.
Standard

Direct Ship Guidance for Aerospace Companies

2014-02-06
CURRENT
ARP9114A
Limited to the aerospace industry, where an approved manufacturer requests a supplier to ship an article against the approved manufacturer’s quality system directly to a customer. The direct ship process is not required or applicable to standard parts or military parts. In this process the approved manufacturer is responsible for assurance that the article conforms to type design information.
Standard

Direct Ship Guidance for Aerospace Companies

2019-04-05
WIP
ARP9114B
This document provides guidance to approved manufacturers, their suppliers, and customers when an approved manufacturer requests a supplier to ship an article against the approved manufacturer’s purchase document directly to a customer, commonly known as “Direct Ship”.
Standard

Direct Ship Guidance for Aerospace Companies

2005-09-09
HISTORICAL
ARP9114
Limited to the Aerospace industry where an approved manufacturer requests a supplier to ship an article against the approved manufacturer’s quality system directly to a customer. The direct ship process is not required or applicable to standard parts or military parts. In this process the approved manufacturer is responsible for assurance that the article conforms to Type Design information.
Standard

Inspection and Test Quality Systems, Requirements for Aviation, Space, and Defense Organizations

2019-10-01
WIP
AS9003B
Price increases in effect for this document as of January 2017 reflect a new copyright agreement for use of ISO 9001:2009. This standard includes selected quality system requirements from ISO 9001:2008[1] and AS9100:2009 applicable to noncomplex products and associated manufacturing processes. ISO 9001 text incorporated into this standard appears in standard font; while aviation, space, and defense industry additional requirements, definitions, and notes are presented in bold, italic text. The requirements of this standard are intended to be applied in whole, without any exclusions. Compliance with all corresponding AS9100 requirements is considered to meet/exceed compliance with the requirements of this standard. The requirements specified in this standard are complementary (not alternative) to contractual and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements.
Standard

Data Matrix Quality Requirements for Parts Marking

2005-02-16
HISTORICAL
AS9132A
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) defines uniform Quality and Technical requirements relative to metallic parts marking performed in using "Data Matrix symbology" used within the aerospace industry. The ISO/IEC 16022 specifies general requirements (data character encodation, error correction rules, decoding algorithm, etc.). In addition to ISO/IEC 16022 specification, part identification with such symbology is subject to the following requirements to ensure electronic reading of the symbol. The marking processes covered by this standard are as follows: Dot Peening Laser Electro-Chemical Etching Further marking processes will be included if required. This standard does not specify information to be encoded. Unless specified otherwise in the contractual business relationship, the company responsible for the design of the part shall determine the location of the Data Matrix Marking. Symbol position should allow optimum illumination from all sides for readability.
X