Refine Your Search

Search Results

Viewing 1 to 5 of 5
Technical Paper

Kinetic Energies Involved in Racing Facility Design

2002-12-02
2002-01-3344
The various forms of professional and amateur motor sports all require barriers, fences and deceleration/run-off areas for driver and spectator safety. We examine the translational and rotational kinetic energies involved for various types of race vehicles, and present some comparisons to typical energies encountered in everyday situations. Stopping distance vs. deceleration rates are also calculated, and some simplified trajectory analyses are performed for parts potentially launched during racing accidents.
Technical Paper

Evasive Maneuver Capability Without and In the Presence of a Flat Tire

1994-12-01
942469
The relatively fragile nature of racing tires, coupled with the inevitable track debris which results from racing accidents, ensures that racing drivers will routinely experience conditions involving flat tire vehicle dynamics. We define flat tire vehicle dynamics as a situation which requires the driver to provide steering and/or braking and acceleration control while the vehicle is running on one or more tires which have dramatically reduced tire pressure. In the present work, we simulate the handling and braking vehicle dynamics which occur in the presence of a single flat tire on the vehicle. The flat tire was simulated via drastically reduced cornering stiffness, partially reduced limiting frictional capability and increased rolling resistance, and was alternatively simulated on both the front and rear axle. No simulations were conducted with more than a single flat tire because multiple tire failures which do not involve an actual accident contact and/or damage are rare.
Technical Paper

Analysis of 1994 Indianapolis 500-Mile Race and Practice Accidents

1994-12-01
942480
During the month of May, 1994, there were a total of 15 accidents at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway (IMS). Of this total, six accidents occurred during practice and/or Qualifications Attempts and nine occurred during the 78th running of the Indianapolis 500-Mile Race. All six practice accidents were analyzed through the use of videography, skidmark measurements, photographs, angle of wall impact (if a wall impact occurred), vehicle damage and yaw angle measurements. The accidents were categorized according to type and severity, mechanical failure or driver error, speed at the initiation of the accident sequence, driver injury (if injuries occurred), weather, track and traffic conditions. Race accidents were also analyzed. The study represents the continuation of a long-term program to catalog, analyze and reconstruct accidents at IMS.
Technical Paper

Analysis of a Dirt Track Sprint Car Accident

1994-12-01
942548
Open-wheel dirt-track racing represents one of the most dangerous forms of motor racing. The potential for touching and/or interlocking of rotating wheels, combined with the frangible and rutted nature of the track surface itself, makes the occurrence of x-axis [8] rollovers routine. In addition, the rollovers themselves are usually at a high enough speed so that very violent dynamics and occupant accelerations occur. The accelerative vectors present an unusual set of challenges to the restraint systems employed. In this work, we examine a single dirt-track rollover event.
Technical Paper

The Simulation of Driver Inputs Using a Vehicle Driver Model

2000-03-06
2000-01-1313
Traditional vehicle simulations use two methods of modeling driver inputs, such as steering and braking. These methods are broadly categorized as “Open Loop” and “Closed Loop”. Open loop methods are most common and use tables of driver inputs vs time. Closed loop methods employ a mathematical model of the driving task and some method of defining an attempted path for the vehicle to follow. Closed loop methods have a significant advantage over open loop methods in that they do not require a trial-and-error approach normally required by open loop methods to achieve the desired vehicle path. As a result, closed loop methods may result in significant time savings and associated user productivity. Historically, however, closed loop methods have had two drawbacks: First, they require user inputs that are non-intuitive and difficult to determine. Second, closed loop methods often have stability problems.
X