Refine Your Search

Topic

Search Results

Standard

Mitigation for Loss-of-Control Accidents in Transport Airplanes

2010-08-12
WIP
ARP6149
Prevention of catastrophic upset mishaps cannot depend solely on recovery training. The proposed document should complement the training initiatives already in place. As a committee dealing with transport human factors and handling qualities, the output must consider both issues. At the same time, we cannot ignore initial and recurrent training issues and the widespread use of ground-based simulators. The plan would follow the approach taken in the 2003 S-7 white paper but would extend the scope to all forms of LOC, not just repeated rudder reversals. As with the white pa-per, the new document would have sections on transport handling qualities, flight control modes, aircraft displays, simulator requirements, and approval for IFR test evaluations as well as covering training issues. This new document would complement, not replace documents such as the Airplane Upset Recovery Training Aid.
Standard

Display Latency Evaluation Procedures

2012-12-03
WIP
ARP6238
This Aerospace Recommended Practice will identify the problem with latency in the pilot's instrument control of an aircraft. Recommended evaluation techniques to characterize control problems will be documented.
Standard

INTEGRATION PROCEDURES FOR THE INTRODUCTION OF NEW SYSTEMS TO THE COCKPIT

1995-03-01
CURRENT
ARP4927
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) provides guidance to achieve the optimum integration of new aircraft systems which have an impact on the cockpit layout or crew operating procedures. This process may also be used for modification of existing cockpits.
Standard

Flight Deck Alerting System (FAS)

2017-01-27
WIP
ARP4102/4A
This document recommends design criteria for the Flight Deck Alerting System. The FAS shall enhance safety of flight by providing early crew recognition of aircraft system or component status or malfunction as well as of crew operational error. The FAS, therefore, relates to aircraft configuration and flight phase as well as the aircraft systems. To fulfill this objective, the FAS must attract the attention of the crew, must state with clarity the nature and location of the problem, and must be highly reliable and thoroughly responsive to the operational requirements and environment. Wherever possible, it should provide guidance as to the corrective action.
Standard

Flight Deck Alerting System (FAS)

1988-07-01
CURRENT
ARP4102/4
This document recommends design criteria for the Flight Deck Alerting System. The FAS shall enhance safety of flight by providing early crew recognition of aircraft system or component status or malfunction as well as of crew operational error. The FAS, therefore, relates to aircraft configuration and flight phase as well as the aircraft systems. To fulfill this objective, the FAS must attract the attention of the crew, must state with clarity the nature and location of the problem, and must be highly reliable and thoroughly responsive to the operational requirements and environment. Wherever possible, it should provide guidance as to the corrective action.
Standard

Design Objectives for Handling Qualities of Transport Aircraft

1988-07-01
CURRENT
ARP4104
This document specifies the requirements for the design objectives for handling qualities applicable to transport aircraft operating in the subsonic, transonic, and supersonic speed range. These objectives are not necessarily applicable to rotor or VTOL aircraft.
Standard

Takeoff Performance Monitor (TOPM) System, Airplane, Minimum Performance Standard for

2020-05-15
CURRENT
AS8044A
This Aerospace Standard (AS), establishes minimum performance standards for those sensors, computers, transponders, and airplane flight deck controls/displays which together comprise a Takeoff Performance Monitor (TOPM) System. This standard also defines functional capabilities, design requirements, and test procedures. A TOPM system is intended to monitor the progress of the takeoff and to provide advisory information which the crew may use in conjunction with other available cues to decide to continue or abort the takeoff. See Appendix A for supplementary information relating to NTSB, CAA, and ad hoc committee concerns and background information.
Standard

FLIGHT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (FMS)

1995-05-01
HISTORICAL
ARP4102/9
This document recommends criteria and requirements for a Flight Management System (FMS) for transport aircraft.
Standard

Flight Envelope Awareness/Protection

1993-06-01
CURRENT
ARP4104/1
This annex recommends additional design objectives applicable when control laws or control characteristics are modified for the purpose of Flight Envelope Awareness/Protection. While only manually controlled flight is addressed, it is assumed that Autoflight, Autothrottle, or Autothrust performance is compatible.
Standard

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS FOR USE ON THE FLIGHT DECK

1988-07-01
HISTORICAL
ARP4105A
This document is intended to establish preferred abbreviations for terms used on panels, controls, displays, instruments, placards, and markings. The recommendations apply to equipment used by crew members in the flight deck of transport aircraft. The abbreviations, acronyms, and symbols do not supersede those used in airworthiness regulations or aeronautical charts or other aircraft documents.
Standard

Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Terms for Use on the Flight Deck

2012-11-19
CURRENT
ARP4105C
This document is intended to establish preferred abbreviations and acronyms for terms used on panels, controls, displays, instruments, placards, and markings. The recommendations apply to equipment used by crew members in the flight deck of transport aircraft.
Standard

Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Terms for Use on the Flight Deck

2019-10-03
WIP
ARP4105D
This document is intended to establish preferred abbreviations and acronyms for terms used on panels, controls, displays, instruments, placards, and markings. The recommendations apply to equipment used by crew members in the flight deck of transport aircraft.
Standard

Crew Safety Provisions for Cargo Aircraft

2013-07-18
CURRENT
ARP4101/9A
This document recommends provisions for crew safety and survival which are intended to apply to cargo or combination aircraft and equipment.
X