Search Results

As the automotive industry prepares to roll out an unprecedented range of fully electric propulsion vehicle models over the next few years - it really brings to a head for folks responsible for brakes what used to be the subject of hypothetical musings and are now pivotal questions for system design. How do we really go about designing brakes for electric vehicles, in particular, for the well-known limit condition of descending a steep grade? What is really an “optimal’ design for brakes considering the imperatives for the entire vehicle? What are the real “limit conditions” for usage that drive the fundamental design? Are there really electric charging stations planned for or even already existing in high elevations that can affect regenerative brake capacity on the way down? What should be communicated to drivers (if anything) about driving habits for electric vehicles in routes with significant elevation change?

As fossil fuels dwindle and more electric vehicles enter the market, there is an opportunity to reevaluate the standard brake system. This paper will discuss and compare the differences in brake system sizing between a non-regenerative braking internal combustion engine vehicle and a dedicated battery electric vehicle with regenerative braking. It will use a model derived from component dynamometer testing and vehicle test data of a mid-size production vehicle. The model will be modified for the mass and regenerative braking capabilities of a battery electric vehicle. The contribution of regenerative braking energy will be analyzed and compared to show its impact on component sizing, thermal sizing, and lining life. The detailed design study will calculate the parameters for caliper, rotor design, actuation, etc., that are optimized for 100% regen enabled vehicles.

The modern braking system in the field today may be controlled by over a million lines of computer code and may feature several hundred moving parts. Although modern brake systems generally deliver performance, even with partial failures present in the system, that is well above regulatory minimums, they also have a level of complexity that extends well beyond what the authors of existing regulations had envisioned. Complexity in the braking system is poised for significant increases as advanced technologies such as self-driving vehicles are introduced, and as multiple systems are linked together to provide vehicle-level “features” to the driver such as deceleration (which can invoke service braking, regenerative braking, use of the parking brake, and engine braking). Rigorous safety-case analysis is critical to bring a new brake system concept to market but may be too tedious and rely on too many assumptions to be useful in the early architecting stages of new vehicle development.

De-centralized brake actuation – that is, brake systems that incorporate individual actuators at each wheel brake location to both provide the apply energy and the modulation of braking force – is not a new area of study. Typically realized in the form of electro-mechanical brake calipers or drum brakes, or as “single corner” hydraulic actuators, de-centralized actuation in braking systems has already been deployed in production on General Motor EV1 Electric Vehicle (1997) in the form of electric drum brakes and has been studied continually by the automotive industry since then. It is frequently confused with “brake by wire,” and indeed practical implementations of de-centralized actuation are a form of brake by wire technology. However, with millions of vehicles on the road already with “brake by wire” systems - the vast majority of which have centralized brake actuation – the future of “brake by wire” is arguable settled.

The validation of brake discs has remained, to this day, heavily reliant on “Thermal Abuse” or “Thermal Cracking” type testing, with many procedures so dated that most engineers active in the industry today cannot even recall the origin of the test. These procedures - of which there are many variants - all share the trait of greatly accelerating durability testing by performing repeated high power (high speed and high deceleration) brake applies to drive huge temperature gradients and internal stress, and often allowing the disc to get very hot, to where the strength of the material from which the disc is constructed is significantly degraded. There is little debate about whether these procedures work; by and large disc durability issues in the field are extremely rare.

Regenerative braking without question greatly impacts brake pad service life in the field, in most cases extending it significantly. Estimating its impact precisely has not been an overriding concern - yet - due in part to the extensive sharing of brake components between regen-intensive battery-electric and hybrid vehicles, and their more friction-brake intensive internal combustion engine powered sibling. However, a multitude of factors are elevating the need for a more accurate estimation, including the emerging of dedicated electric vehicle architectures with opportunities for optimizing the friction brake design, a sharp focus on brake particulate emissions and the role of regenerative braking, a need to make design decisions for features such as corrosion protection for brake pad and pad slide components, and the emergence of driver-facing features such as Brake Pad Life Monitoring.