Refine Your Search

Search Results

Viewing 1 to 2 of 2
Technical Paper

Design, Characterization and Initial Testing of a Vertical Stabilizer Common Research Model for Aircraft Ground Icing Testing

2023-06-15
2023-01-1439
Under contract to Transport Canada (TC) and with joint funding support from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), a vertical stabilizer common research model (VS-CRM) has been designed and built by the National Research Council of Canada (NRC). This model is a realistic, scaled representation of modern vertical stabilizer designs without being specific to a particular aircraft. The model was installed and tested in the NRC 3 m × 6 m Icing Wind Tunnel in late 2021/early 2022. Testing was led by APS Aviation Inc., with support from NRC and NASA, in order to observe the anti-icing fluids flow-off behavior with and without freezing or frozen precipitation during simulated take-off velocity profiles. The model dry-air aerodynamic properties were characterized using flow visualization tufts and boundary layer rakes. Using this data, a target baseline configuration was selected with a yaw angle equal to 0° and rudder deflection angle equal to -10°.
Technical Paper

Evaluation of Visual Failure versus Aerodynamic Limit for a Snow Contaminated Anti-Iced Wing Section during Simulated Takeoff

2019-06-10
2019-01-1972
Under contract to Airlines for America (A4A), APS Aviation Inc. (APS), in collaboration with the National Research Council of Canada (NRC), completed an aircraft ground icing exploratory research project at the NRC 3 m × 6 m Wind Tunnel in Ottawa in January 2019. The purpose of this project was to investigate the feasibility of using aerodynamic data to evaluate the performance of contaminated anti-icing fluid, rather than the traditional visual fluid failure indicators that are used to develop Holdover Times (HOTs). The aerodynamic performance of a supercritical airfoil model with anti-icing fluids and snow contamination was evaluated against the clean, dry performance of the airfoil in order to calculate the associated aerodynamic penalty. The visual failure of the fluid was also evaluated for each run, and the visual and aerodynamic results were compared against each other for each contamination exposure time.
X