Refine Your Search

Search Results

Viewing 1 to 14 of 14
Standard

Pneumatic Spring Terminology

2016-04-01
CURRENT
J511_201604
This pneumatic spring terminology has been developed to assist engineers and designers in the preparation of specifications and descriptive material relating to pneumatic springs and their components. It does not include gas supply or control systems.
Standard

PNEUMATIC SPRING TERMINOLOGY

1989-06-01
HISTORICAL
J511_198906
This pneumatic spring terminology has been developed to assist engineers and designers in the preparation of specifications and descriptive material relating to pneumatic springs and their components. It does not include gas supply or control systems.
Standard

Fatigue Testing Procedure for Suspension-Leaf Springs

2016-04-05
CURRENT
J1528_201604
Only fully processed new springs which are representative of springs intended for the vehicle shall be used for the tests. No complete spring or separate leaf shall be used for more than one test.
Standard

FATIGUE TESTING PROCEDURE FOR SUSPENSION-LEAF SPRINGS

1990-06-30
HISTORICAL
J1528_199006
Only fully processed new springs which are representative of springs intended for the vehicle shall be used for the tests. No complete spring or separate leaf shall be used for more than one test.
Standard

Test Method for Evaluating the Sealing Capability of Hose Connections with a PVT Test Facility

2012-10-24
CURRENT
J1610_201210
This test method provides a standardized procedure for evaluating the sealing capability of a hose connection or any of the individual components of the connection with a pressure, vibration, and temperature (PVT) test facility. This test method consists of a test procedure which includes vibration and coolant flow (#1 ) and a similar test procedure specified without vibration or coolant flow (#2). Any test parameters, other than those specified in this SAE Recommended Practice, are to be agreed to by the tester and the requestor.
Standard

Test Method for Evaluating the Sealing Capability of Hose connections with a PVT Test Facility

1992-06-24
HISTORICAL
J1610_199206
This test method provides a standardized procedure for evaluating the sealing capability of a hose connection or any of the individual components of the connection with a pressure, vibration, and temperature (PVT) test facility. This test method consists of a test procedure which includes vibration and coolant flow and a similar test procedure specified without vibration or coolant flow. Any test parameters, other than those specified in this SAE Recommended Practice, are to be agreed to by the tester and the requestor.
Standard

Test Method for Evaluating the Sealing Capability of Hose Connectionswith a PVT Test Facility

2001-06-08
HISTORICAL
J1610_200106
This test method provides a standardized procedure for evaluating the sealing capability of a hose connection or any of the individual components of the connection with a pressure, vibration, and temperature (PVT) test facility. This test method consists of a test procedure which includes vibration and coolant flow (#1) and a similar test procedure specified without vibration or coolant flow (#2). Any test parameters, other than those specified in this SAE Recommended Practice, are to be agreed to by the tester and the requestor.
Standard

GUIDELINES FOR LABORATORY CYCLIC CORROSION TEST PROCEDURES FOR PAINTED AUTOMOTIVE PARTS

1993-10-13
HISTORICAL
J1563_199310
These guidelines are intended for those engineers and scientists who evaluate the corrosion performance of painted automotive parts in laboratory cyclic tests. The guidelines are intended to help ensure that the results of the tests can be used to reach conclusions concerning the variables under study without being confounded by the test procedure itself. The guidelines also serve as a means to assist users of this type of test in obtaining good inter-laboratory agreement of results.
Standard

Guidelines for Laboratory Cyclic Corrosion Test Procedures for Painted Automotive Parts

2016-04-05
CURRENT
J1563_201604
These guidelines are intended for those engineers and scientists who evaluate the corrosion performance of painted automotive parts in laboratory cyclic tests. The guidelines are intended to help ensure that the results of the tests can be used to reach conclusions concerning the variables under study without being confounded by the test procedure itself. The guidelines also serve as a means to assist users of this type of test in obtaining good inter-laboratory agreement of results.
Standard

PROVING GROUND VEHICLE CORROSION TESTING

1989-05-01
HISTORICAL
J1950_198905
The facilities used by domestic automotive manufacturers to provide accelerated corrosion aging of complete vehicles are described in general. The types of vehicles tested, general test methodology, and techniques used to determine test-to-field correlation are discussed. The different procedures used throughout the industry produce different results on various vehicle coatings, components, and systems. The key to successful interpretation of test results is a thorough understanding of the corrosion mechanisms involved and the effects of test limitations on these mechanisms.
Standard

Proving Ground Vehicle Corrosion Testing

2016-04-05
CURRENT
J1950_201604
The facilities used by domestic automotive manufacturers to provide accelerated corrosion aging of complete vehicles are described in general. The types of vehicles tested, general test methodology, and techniques used to determine test-to-field correlation are discussed. The different procedures used throughout the industry produce different results on various vehicle coatings, components, and systems. The key to successful interpretation of test results is a thorough understanding of the corrosion mechanisms involved and the effects of test limitations on these mechanisms.
Standard

Recommended Practices for Design and Evaluation of Passenger and Light Truck Coolant Hose Clamped Joints

1996-07-01
HISTORICAL
J1697_199607
This SAE Recommended Practice covers recommended practices for design and evaluation of hose clamped joints primarily in automotive applications. It is intended to: (a) evaluate current joint designs, (b) compare existing designs, (c) aid in the development of new designs, (d) give objective results once weights are set, (e) rate the overall design and individual sections of design, (f) encourage future research by industry and the OEM's.
Standard

Recommended Practices for Design and Evaluation of Passenger and Light Truck Coolant Hose Clamped Joints

2003-11-07
HISTORICAL
J1697_200311
This SAE Recommended Practice covers recommended practices for design and evaluation of hose clamped joints primarily in automotive applications. It is intended to: (a) evaluate current joint designs, (b) compare existing designs, (c) aid in the development of new designs, (d) give objective results once weights are set, (e) rate the overall design and individual sections of design, and (f) encourage future research by industry and the OEM's.
Standard

Recommended Practices for Design and Evaluation of Passenger and Light Truck Coolant Hose Clamped Joints

2013-07-09
CURRENT
J1697_201307
This SAE Recommended Practice covers recommended practices for design and evaluation of hose clamped joints primarily in automotive applications. It is intended to: (a) evaluate current joint designs, (b) compare existing designs, (c) aid in the development of new designs, (d) give objective results once weights are set, (e) rate the overall design and individual sections of design, and (f) encourage future research by industry and the OEM's.
X