Refine Your Search

Topic

Search Results

Standard

Flight Management Systems Review

1995-08-01
CURRENT
AIR4653
The information contained in this document is based on line experience with current systems. It should be used as a basis for ongoing research and development including the human factors aspects of future flight management systems and their interaction with the ATC environment.
Standard

Final Approach Spacing System (Fass)

2017-01-27
WIP
ARP5628A
This document recommends criteria and requirements for a Final Approach Spacing System (FASS) for transport aircraft. This is an Aerospace Recommended Practice to support the development of a Final Approach Spacing System (FASS) for Approach Spacing for Instrument Approaches (ASIA) operations.
Standard

Display Latency Evaluation Procedures

2012-12-03
WIP
ARP6238
This Aerospace Recommended Practice will identify the problem with latency in the pilot's instrument control of an aircraft. Recommended evaluation techniques to characterize control problems will be documented.
Standard

Electronic Displays

2019-03-12
WIP
ARP4102/7A
This document recommends criteria for electronic displays on the flight deck of transport aircraft. Electronic displays include electronic flight instruments, alert displays, aircraft system displays and control/display units for flight management and radio management systems.
Standard

Flight Deck Panels, Controls, and Displays

2019-03-12
WIP
ARP4102A
This document recommends criteria for the design, installation and operation of panels, controls, and displays on the flight deck of transport aircraft.
Standard

Electronic Displays

1988-07-01
CURRENT
ARP4102/7
This document recommends criteria for electronic displays on the flight deck of transport aircraft. Electronic displays include electronic flight instruments, alert displays, aircraft system displays and control/display units for flight management and radio management systems.
Standard

Autopilot, Flight Director, and Autothrust Systems

2001-10-01
CURRENT
ARP5366
This document recommends criteria for the design and installation of Autopilot, Flight Director and Autothrust Systems. These three systems are highly interrelated and will be referred to generically as an Integrated Flight Guidance System (IFGS).
Standard

FLIGHT DECK PANELS, CONTROLS, AND DISPLAYS

1988-07-01
CURRENT
ARP4102
This document recommends criteria for the design, installation and operation of panels, controls, and displays on the flight deck of transport aircraft.
Standard

Crew Safety Provisions for Cargo Aircraft

1988-07-01
HISTORICAL
ARP4101/9
This document recommends provisions for crew safety and survival which are intended to apply to cargo or combination aircraft and equipment.
Standard

Crew Safety Provisions for Cargo Aircraft

2013-07-18
CURRENT
ARP4101/9A
This document recommends provisions for crew safety and survival which are intended to apply to cargo or combination aircraft and equipment.
Standard

TAKEOFF PERFORMANCE MONITOR (TOPM) SYSTEM, AIRPLANE, MINIMUM PERFORMANCE STANDARD FOR

1987-08-01
CURRENT
AS8044
This Aerospace Standard (AS), establishes minimum performance standards for those sensors, computers, transponders, and airplane flight deck controls/displays which together comprise a Takeoff Performance Monitor (TOPM) System. This standard also defines functional capabilities, design requirements, and test procedures. A TOPM system is intended to monitor the progress of the takeoff and to provide advisory information which the crew may use in conjunction with other available cues to decide to continue or abort the takeoff. See Appendix A for supplementary information relating to NTSB, CAA, and ad hoc committee concerns and background information.
Standard

NOMENCLATURE AND ABBREVIATIONS FOR USE ON THE FLIGHT DECK

1985-12-15
CURRENT
AS425C
This Standard is intended to establish preferred abbreviations for use on panels, controls, instruments, displays, placards and markings. The recommendations apply to terms used in the flight deck of transport aircraft. The abbreviations, symbols and codes do not supersede those used in airworthiness regulations or aeronautical charts and documents. Where conflict is possible the operational context must be such as to resolve any ambiguity. If doubt exists, an alternative abbreviation or less truncated abbreviation should be used.
Standard

Flight Deck Environment

2002-12-16
CURRENT
ARP1411
This Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) is intended to specify the environmental conditions necessary to permit the operating crew of large civil transport aircraft to perform their required duties and functions in comfort, with minimum fatigue and no distraction. Environmental conditions should cause no short or long-term effects deleterious to health or physical well being, nor significantly impair ability to perform normal flight deck crew functions.
X