Search Results

Engineering specifications, i.e. test bogeys, are criterion for determining the success or failure of durability designs in the product development process. Considerations in the development of the specifications for vehicle structural components, such as axle housings and suspension torque rods, have been presented in a previous SAE paper [1]. This paper has been prepared because the factors on the same subject for vehicle drive train components, such as gears and bearings, are quite different. The center of this study is on “how to define equivalent duty cycles for lab test”. Several issues distinguish this task for drive train components: High cycle fatigue, high accelerated tests, competitive failures and failure modes, empirical component load-life data, loading, field correlation, and system level tests.

To validate the integrity of a commercial vehicle's exhaust system's structural design is a challenging job. An integrated approach to use both simulation/modeling and hardware testing must be employed to reduce product development cost. In addition to the considerations of the geometry and configuration specs of 70-90 parts and joints as well as material's thermal and mechanical property data in model development, representative loading must be used. For base excitation type of loading, such as the one experienced by the vehicle's exhaust system, one must decide whether to conduct the time domain transient analysis or frequency domain random vibration analysis. Although both methods are well known, few discussions can be found in the literature regarding their effective use in the framework of product design and development. Based on our study, the random vibration method should be used first for identifying high stress locations in the system and for design optimization.

In this paper, we describe the development of multi-axis, accelerated durability tests for commercial vehicle suspension systems. The objective of the exercise is to design accelerated durability tests that have well-defined correlation with customer usage. The procedure starts with a definition of the vehicle's duty cycle based on the expected operational parameters, namely: road profile, vehicle speed, and warranty life. The second step is determining the durability proving ground test schedule such that the accumulated pseudo-damage (based on spindle loads) is representative of the vehicle's duty cycle. The third step in the process is developing a multi-axis laboratory rig test for the suspension system, such that the accumulated damage in the proving ground is replicated in a compressed time frame.

Virtual proving ground (VPG) simulations have been popular with passenger vehicles. VPG uses LS-DYNA based non-linear contact Finite Element analysis (FEA) to estimate fully analytical road loads and to predict structural components durability with PG road surfaces and tire represented as Finite elements. Heavy vehicle industry has not used these tools extensively in the past due to the complexity of heavy vehicle systems and especially due to the higher number of tires in the vehicle compared to the passenger car. The higher number tires in the heavy vehicle requires more computational analysis duration compared to the passenger car. However due to the recent advancements in computer hardware, virtual proving ground simulations can be used for heavy vehicles. In this study we have used virtual proving ground based simulation studies to predict the durability performance of a trailer suspension frame.

Premature parts breakdown in the final drive of heavy vehicle powertrains in vehicles equipped with high power retarders leads one to believe that the coasting mode gear forces may be higher than anticipated. There is limited experimental data that supports this hypothesis in the observation of high bearing load and gear bending stress in coast mode. However, without an in-depth analysis, it is unclear exactly how the high load is generated. There are several suggested causes: friction, gear geometry, and system compliance. The present study focuses on the effects of hypoid gear friction on the powertrain. Analytical expressions of the gear friction vector as a function of gear pressure, pitch and spiral angles, spiral hand and directions of rotation and applied torque were derived and examined. Attempts were made to correlate test-measured quantities and results from analytical models with and without the consideration of gear friction.