Search Results

This paper presents calculations of engine flows by using the Partially-Averaged Navier Stokes (PANS) method (Girimaji [1]; [2]). The PANS is a scale-resolving turbulence computational approach designed to resolve large scale fluctuations and model the remainder with appropriate closures. Depending upon the prescribed cut-off length (filter width) the method adjusts seamlessly from the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) to the Direct Numerical Solution (DNS) of the Navier-Stokes equations. The PANS method was successfully used for many applications but mainly on static geometries, e.g. Basara et al. [3]; [4]. This is due to the calculation of the cut-off control parameter which requires that the resolved kinetic energy is known and this is usually obtained by suitably averaging of the resolved field. Such averaging process is expensive and impractical for engines as it would require averaging per cycles.

The present paper deals with the application of the LES approach to in-cylinder flow modeling. The main target is to study cycle-to-cycle variability (CCV) using 3D-CFD simulation. The engine model is based on a spark-ignited single-cylinder research engine. The results presented in this paper cover the motored regime aiming at analysis of the cycle-resolved local flow properties at the spark plug close to firing top dead center. The results presented in this paper suggest that the LES approach adopted in the present study is working well and that it predicts CCV and that the qualitative trends are in-line with established knowledge of internal combustion engine (ICE) in-cylinder flow. The results are evaluated from a statistical point of view based on calculations of many consecutive cycles (at least 10).

This paper presents calculations of external car aerodynamics by using the Partial-Averaged Navier-Stokes (PANS) variable resolution model in conjunction with the Finite Volume (FV) immersed-boundary method. The work presented here is the continuation of the study reported in Basara et al. [1, 2]. In that work, it was shown that the same accuracy of predicted aerodynamic forces could be achieved for both types of computational meshes, the standard body-fitted mesh and the immersed boundary (IB) Cartesian mesh, by using the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) k-ζ-f model as well as by using the Partially-Averaged Navier-Stokes (PANS) method. Based on the accuracy achieved, Basara et al. [2] concluded that further work could focus on evaluating the turbulence modelling on the immersed boundary meshes only.