Search Results

Changing of emission levels leads to an increasing demand for a satisfying solution to measure mass emissions of motor vehicles on both, engine and chassis dynamometers. Partial flow systems may fit to the demands. These systems require an exact determination of exhaust volume flow and time aligned concentration measurement. This paper will address these issues and problems related with partial flow sampling. Several exhaust flow measurement systems have been studied and integrated mass results have been checked against the full flow CVS. As the investigations indicate, modal mass calculation from sampling direct exhaust at the end of tailpipe is feasible but not a satisfying solution in equivalency and repeatability in comparison to CVS-results. This is especially the case on emission levels near or below ULEV.

For the measurement of exhaust emissions, Constant Volume Sampling (CVS) technology is recommended by legislation and has proven its practical capability in the past. However, the introduction of new low emission standards has raised questions regarding the accuracy and variability of the CVS system when measuring very low emission levels. This paper will show that CVS has the potential to achieve sufficient precision for certification of SULEV concepts. Thus, there is no need for the introduction of new test methods involving high cost. An analysis of the CVS basic equations indicates the importance of the Dilution Factor (DF) for calculating true mass emissions. A test series will demonstrate that, by adjusting the dilution and using state of the art analyzers, the consistency of exhaust results is comparable with those of LEV concepts, measured with conventional CVS systems and former standard analyzers.