Search Results

An analysis has been conducted on the hydrostatic drive system for driving a soil bin. A comparison of the bin velocity was made between the pure inertia load and inertia plus disturbance. Also, the pressure fluctuations that are predicted are quite sensitive to the leakage values chosen. A low leakage value predicts an oscillatory pressure response. Although no feedback was employed for the velocity output, the load disturbance changed the output velocity very little.

The differences between courses offered agricultural and mechanical engineers are examined. The topics in the courses are reviewed in some detail. The students start with a review of basic fluid mechanics followed by an introduction to bulk modulus. Governing equations for pumps motors and valves are introduced next. Course emphasis then diverges. The agricultural engineers cover the basics of control theory to cover a deficiency in their undergraduate curriculum. The mechanical engineers embark on more rigorous examination of the simulation of fluid power components. Students in both departments may elect to take a 1 cr. laboratory course. The laboratory exercises are discussed.

The success of agricultural and construction machinery owes a great deal to the effective use of fluid power. Most fluid power systems are configured with a positive displacement fluid pump that is large enough to meet the flow requirements of many work circuits. Different work functions require a variety of fluid flow and pressure values to provide the desired operation. System branches, therefore, must include specialized flow and pressure regulating valves. The development of a mathematical model of a fluid flow control valve follows.

European and American suspension systems are described for improving the operator ride comfort on off-road vehicles. Analytical methods are then described to predict the dynamic behavior of a vehicle and human ride response criteria. The approach includes the selection of a terrain input to excite the vehicle model formulated by the generalized mechanical system simulation programs. An example involving an agricultural tractor-plow system is presented to illustrate the techniques.

The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate a computer program developed for interactive optimization of dynamic systems represented by ordinary differential equations. The program is capable of minimizing a cost function with respect to from one to five design variables. The program is command driven with on line help and has interactive graphics capability for displaying output. Three vehicle dynamics examples are used to demonstrate the capabilities of the program, and in doing so reveal some interesting vehicle handling results.

Engineers and technicians have used mathematical analysis, in the design of fluid power machinery, for as long as this art has been known. As the machinery became more complex, analysis methods have had difficulty in meeting design needs. Some equation sets appropriate for fluid power devices are very difficult to solve with general mathematical methods. Electronic computers now make it possible to solve complex mathematical models. As fluid power analysis has evolved, software has been produced that is appropriate for fluid power analysis. The question then arises, as to how reliable and accurate this software may be. Some previous studies indicate that different types of software produce results that are quite similar in quality, however, quantitative answers may vary slightly (1, 2)*. This study compares the design analysis results for a fluid power attenuator obtained with the HYSAN** software and a previous study reported in the SAE Transactions (3).