Search Results

Diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) is one of the critical catalyst components in modern diesel aftertreatment systems. It mainly converts unburned hydrocarbon (HC) and CO to CO2 and H2O before they are released to the environment. In addition, it also oxidizes a portion of NO to NO2, which improves the NOx conversion efficiency via fast SCR over the downstream selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst. HC light-off tests, with or without the presence of NOx, has been typically used for DOC evaluation in laboratory. In this work, we aim to understand the influences of DOC light-off experimental conditions, such as initial temperature, initial holding time, HC species, with or without the presence of NOx, on the DOC HC light-off behavior. The results indicate that light-off test with lower initial temperature and longer initial holding time (at its initial temperature) leads to higher DOC light-off temperature.

Biodiesel is a promising alternative to traditional diesel fuel due to its similar combustion properties to diesel and lower carbon emissions on a well-to-wheel basis. However, combusting biodiesel still generates hydrocarbon (HC), CO, NOx and particulate matter (PM) emissions, similar to those from traditional diesel fuel usage. Therefore, aftertreatment systems will be required to reduce these emissions to meet increasingly stringent emission regulations to minimize the impact to the environment. Diesel oxidation catalysts (DOC) are widely used in modern aftertreatment systems to convert unburned HC and CO, to partially convert NO to NO2 to enhance downstream selective catalytic reaction (SCR) catalyst efficiency via fast SCR and to periodically clean-up DPF via controlled soot oxidation. In this work, we focus on the performance difference between biodiesel and diesel over a commercial DOC catalyst to identify the knowledge gap during the transition from diesel fuel to biodiesel.

Cummins has recently launched next-generation aftertreatment technology, the Single ModuleTM aftertreatment system, for medium-duty and heavy-duty engines used in on-highway and off-highway applications. Besides meeting EPA 2010+ and Euro VI regulations, the Single ModuleTM aftertreatment system offers 60% volume and 40% weight reductions compared to current aftertreatment systems. In this work, we present model-based approaches that were systematically adopted in the design and development of the Cummins Single ModuleTM aftertreatment system. Particularly, a variety of analytical and experimental component-level and system-level validation tools have been used to optimize DOC, DPF, SCR/ASC, as well as the DEF decomposition device.

This study analyzed the impact of transient and multi-mode engine conditions on emissions of dioxins and furans from a variety of diesel aftertreatment configurations. Exhaust aftertreatment systems included combinations of diesel oxidation catalyst, diesel particulate filter, and either Cu/zeolite or Fe/zeolite selective catalytic reduction catalyst. EPA method TO-9A was modified for proportional exhaust gas sampling, whereas EPA method 0023A was modified for raw exhaust gas sampling. Dioxin and furan emissions were first measured with modified method TO-9A during Federal Test Procedure transient cycles, but no toxic dioxins or furans were detected. Measurements were then taken with modified method 0023A during Ramped Mode Cycles-Supplemental Emissions Test experiments. Because more rigorous pre-cleaning and sample extraction procedures were used with this method and lower detection limits were achieved by the analytical laboratory, some dioxin and furan congeners were detected.

Upcoming, stricter diesel exhaust emissions standards will likely require aftertreatment architectures with multiple diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) introduction locations. Managing NH3 slip with technologies such as an ammonia slip catalyst (ASC) will continue to be critical in these future aftertreatment systems. In this study, we evaluate the impact of SO2 exposure on a state-of-the-art commercially available ASC. SO2 is co-fed at 0.5 or 3 ppmv to either approximate or accelerate a real-world exhaust SO2 impact. ASC performance during sulfur co-feeding is measured under a wide variety of simulated real-world conditions. Results indicate that the loss of NO conversion during SCR is dependent on the cumulative SO2 exposure, regardless of the inlet SO2 concentration. Meanwhile, N2O formation under SCR conditions is nonlinearly affected by SO2 exposure, with formation increasing during 0.5 ppmv SO2 exposure but decreasing in the presence of 3 ppmv SO2.

Cu-SSZ-13 selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalysts are broadly applied in diesel aftertreatment systems for the catalytic conversion of oxides of nitrogen (NO + NO2). Diesel exhaust contains a wide range of water vapor concentrations depending on the operating condition. In this study, we evaluate the impact of water vapor on the relevant SCR catalytic functions including NOx conversion, NO oxidation, NH3 oxidation, and N2O formation under both standard and fast SCR conditions. Reactor-based experiments are conducted in the presence and absence of water vapor. Results indicate that water vapor can have both a positive and negative impact on low temperature NOx conversion for standard SCR reaction. At low inlet NOx concentrations, the presence of water vapor has a negative effect on NOx conversion, whereas, at high inlet NO concentrations, water vapor improves NOx conversion.