Search Results

Reliable assessment of occupant thermal comfort can be difficult to obtain within automotive environments, especially under transient and asymmetric heating and cooling scenarios. Evaluation of HVAC system performance in terms of comfort commonly requires human subject testing, which may involve multiple repetitions, as well as multiple test subjects. Instrumentation (typically comprised of an array of temperature sensors) is usually only sparsely applied across the human body, significantly reducing the spatial resolution of available test data. Further, since comfort is highly subjective in nature, a single test protocol can yield a wide variation in results which can only be overcome by increasing the number of test replications and subjects. In light of these difficulties, various types of manikins are finding use in automotive testing scenarios.

An automobile seat’s thermal performance can be challenging to quantify since it requires comprehensive human subject testing. Seat manufacturers must rely on subjective ratings to understand how the construction of a seat and its underlying heating and cooling technology may compare to other seats. Other factors may influence seat ratings published by global marketing information services companies (e.g., JD Power and Associates). In particular, occupants may be biased by the vehicle class in which a seat is installed and by how much the contribution of a specific vehicle’s HVAC system performance affects the perception of seat thermal comfort. Therefore, there is a need for an objective testing methodology that does not rely on human participants but is still capable of producing a thermal performance rating in terms of established thermal comfort scales.