Search Results

For the assessment of vehicle acoustics in the early design stages of a vehicle program, the use of full vehicle SEA models is becoming the standard analysis method in the US automotive industry. One benefit is that OEM's and Tier 1 suppliers are able to cascade lower level acoustic performance targets for NVH systems and components. Detailed SEA system level models can be used to assess the performance of systems such as dash panels, floors and doors, however, the results will be questionable until test data Is available. Correlation can be accomplished with buck testing, which is a common practice in the automotive industry for assessing the STL (sound transmission loss) of vehicle level components. The opportunity to conduct buck testing can be limited by the availability of representative bodies to be cut into bucks and the availability of a transmission loss suite with a suitably large opening.

Lear Corporation has developed a new OneStep™ Liftgate trim module. The panel consists of all mechanical components and a trim cover assembled into one module. This structural liftgate uses the trim substrate and a “beam” as the common attachment point for all liftgate hardware. The assembly includes all of the liftgate components mounted to the back of the interior trim panel.

In many cases, the results from a sound transmission loss (STL) test can differ from facility to facility. Despite the presence of standardized test specifications such as SAE J1400 [1], many issues can create variations in the data unique to that particular setup. These situations have presented themselves in recent tasks in which a reverberation room was relocated into a smaller area than was previously available. Current test projects in the relocated test facility have shown a need to better understand the details influencing the quality of the test data. Issues such as the sample orientation, the volume of the reverberation room, the quality of the sealing between the reverberation and anechoic rooms and even the material itself or the operator's style of positioning the sample all had to be reconsidered. It was determined that an investigation into causes of these differences needed to be launched to improve the setup of the STL test and provide more reliable data.

Continuing effort in measuring human vibration response results in a new design of vibration comfort dummy. The difference between this new dummy and other mechanical dummies is that (1) it uses a soft human-tissue like lower torso so it matches compliance better than the previous ones, and (2) it utilizes the spring and damping characteristics of the compliant lower torso. The lower torso is integrated with a spring-mass load simulating the top body of human so that the integrated dummy consists of two parts. This unique design greatly improves the accuracy and stability of transmissibility measurement and provides a direct application tool in seat prototype development. The results measured with dummy are compared with that measured with 3 human subjects in different percentiles and good match is found in the first transmissibility resonance and overall vibration response.