Search Results

A single-cylinder, two-valve engine was operated with independent cooling circuits for the engine block and cylinder head to investigate the effect of temperature distribution on HC emissions. The goal was to understand and quantify the mechanisms responsible for decreased HC emissions at elevated temperatures. Tests were run at a typical road load condition using two different fuels (a 97 RON blend and isopentane - to eliminate liquid fuel and oil layer absorption effects). The total HC emissions (97 RON fuel) decreased by 15-20% with an increase in either the cylinder head or engine block coolant temperature from 71 to 110 °C. When operating with isopentane the HC emissions decreased by 15-20% with an increase in the engine block temperature from 71 to 110 °C but were essentially unaffected by cylinder head temperature. This indicates that the cylinder head temperature primarily influenced the HC emissions from liquid fuel effects.

A study was carried out to increase our understanding of the emissions of air toxics from normal and high-emitting vehicles. This study is part of a larger study on fuel effects in high-emitting vehicles, and is part of the Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program (AQIRP). Detailed measurements were carried out on the emissions of two vehicles run on industry-average gasoline. The two vehicles, having similar emissions control technologies, represent a high-emitting vehicle and a normal-emitting vehicle. In addition to the regulated emissions (HC, CO, and NOx), a detailed chemical analysis was carried out on the gas - and particle-phase non-regulated emissions. The vehicles were tested over the U.S. EPA UDDS driving schedule. The high emitter was highly variable with regard to emissions, but always operated rich of the stoichiometric point. Up to 46% of fuel carbon was emitted as CO and unburned HC for the high emitter, compared to less than 1.4% for the normal emitter.

It is frequently useful to calculate the theoretical composition of the major components of vehicle exhaust. A software program has been written in Basic (or Quick Basic) which allows the convenient calculation of volume percents of CO, CO2, O2, H2, and H2O from fuel composition (H/C and O/C ratios), the water content (dew point) of the combustion air, and a chosen stoichiometry (air/fuel ratio). The program considers the Water Gas Shift reaction and the production of hydrogen under fuel rich conditions. The program is valid for both standard gasolines and oxygenated blends. Vehicle emissions data, collected to compare values calculated by the program with actual experimentally determined values from vehicle exhaust, show good agreement for measurements made at a series of air/fuel ratios ranging from lambda of 0.85-1.2.

A 1990 Ford Taurus operated on reformulated gasoline was tested under three modes of malfunction: disabled heated exhaust gas oxygen (HEGO) sensor, inactive catalytic converter, and controlled misfire. The vehicle was run for four U.S. EPA UDDS driving schedule (FTP-75) tests at each of the malfunction conditions, as well as under normal operating conditions. An extensive set of emissions data were collected. In addition to the regulated emissions (HC, CO, and NOx), a detailed chemical analysis was carried out to determine the gas- and particle-phase non-regulated emissions. The effect of vehicle malfunction on gas phase emissions was significantly greater than it was on particle phase emissions. For example, CO emissions ranged from 2.57 g/mi (normal operation) to 34.77 g/mi (disable HEGO). Total HCs varied from 0.22 g/mi (normal operation) to 2.21 g/mi (blank catalyst). Emissions of air toxics (1,3-butadiene, benzene, acetaldehyde, and formaldehyde) were also significantly effected.

New regulations from the state of California have established, for the first time, reactivity-based exhaust emissions standards for new vehicles and require that any clean alternative fuels needed by these vehicles be made available. Contained in these regulations are provisions for “reactivity adjustment factors” which will provide credit for vehicles which run on reformulated gasoline. The question arises: given two fuels of different chemical composition, but both meeting the criteria for CA Phase 2 gasoline (reformulated gasoline), how different might the specific reactivity of the exhaust hydrocarbons be? In this study we explored this question by examining the engine-out HC emissions from a single-cylinder version of the 5.4 L modular truck engine run on two different CA Phase 2 fuels.