Search Results

Many existing production engine controllers use event (or constant crank angle increment) based sampling and computation systems. Because the engine events are synchronized to the internal physical processes of an engine, it is widely accepted that this is the most logical approach to engine control. It is the purpose of this paper to deal with this assumption in detail and to illuminate various failures of it in practical systems. The approach of the paper is in terms of overall general control system design. That is to say that the problem of event based engine control is considered as a general control problem with its standard components: 1. modelling (engine plus actuator/sensor), 2. specification of desired performance goals, 3. control system design method selection and 4. experimental testing.

Conventional electronic engine control systems suffer from poor transient air/fuel ratio control accuracy. This is true of speed-throttle, speed-density, and mass air flow (MAF) control systems with either single point (or central) or port fuel injection. The reason for this is that they fail to 1. compensate for the nonlinear dynamics of the fuel film in the intake manifold or in the vicinity of the intake valves. 2. estimate correctly the air mass flow at the location of the injector(s). This paper presents a nonlinear fuel film compensation network and a nonlinear closed loop observer. The nonlinear fuel film compensator gives improved global cancellation of the fuel film dynamics, while the closed loop observer has improved robustness with respect to modelling error and measurement noise. The closed loop observer is based on a modified constant gain extended Kalman filter.