Search Results

The flow field and body aerodynamic loads on the DrivAer reference model have been extensively investigated since its introduction in 2012. However, there is a relative lack of information relating to the models wake development resulting from the different rear-body configurations, particularly in the far-field. Given current interest in the aerodynamic interaction between two or more vehicles, the results from a preliminary CFD study are presented to address the development of the wake from the Fastback, Notchback, and Estateback DrivAer configurations. The primary focus is on the differences in the far-field wake and simulations are assessed in the range up to three vehicle lengths downstream, at Reynolds and Mach numbers of 5.2×106 and 0.13, respectively. Wake development is modelled using the results from a Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulation within a computational mesh having nominally 1.0×107 cells.

In automotive aerodynamics much use has been made of generic reference models for research and correlation. Research work has been conducted mostly on small-scale versions of the models to investigate flow regimes and aerodynamic force and moment characteristics while correlation tests have made use of full-scale models to compare results between wind tunnels. More recently reference geometries have also been used as test cases in the validation of computational techniques. This paper reviews the design characteristics and use of several key reference models. The advantages and disadvantages of these designs and also the applicability of the results in providing guidelines for the development of production vehicles are discussed. It is advocated that when researchers choose to use simple models, existing reference geometries should be employed.

The simulation of heat exchanger air flow characteristics in a sub-scale wind tunnel test requires an accurate representation of the full-scale pressure drop across the element. In practice this is normally achieved using laminations of various porous materials and honeycombs on the basis of experience and ad hoc data. In view of this, a series of measurements of the pressure drop, in both the near and far field, across screens with porosity (β) in the range 0.41 ≺ β ≺ 0.76 are reported. The aim being to establish a relationship between the porosity and the pressure drop characteristics of a given material at various angles of inclination to the free-stream flow. Furthermore, the effect of screen depth was investigated using honeycombs. This data will facilitate detailed design and accurate representation of the flow characteristics at sub scale.