Refine Your Search

Topic

Search Results

Standard

Airborne Landing Guidance System for Transport Aircraft

2008-06-04
HISTORICAL
ARP4102/12A
This document specifies requirements for an Airborne Landing Guidance System (ALGS) electronic device. This equipment shall derive relative aircraft position and situation information for flight along precision three-dimensional paths within the appropriate coverage area. The precision three-dimensional path may be an ILS straight-in look-alike path or a complex, curved path. The requirements are applicable to electronic devices capable of receiving signals or other information from one or more sources, including but not limited to ILS, MLS, GNSS, or IRU inputs.
Standard

Airborne Windshear Systems

2016-09-28
WIP
ARP4102/11D
This document recommends criteria for Airborne Windshear Systems, including operational objectives, characteristics and functional requirements. The recommendations of the document apply to transport aircraft, and describe the operational objectives of windshear alerting systems, situational displays, guidance systems and avoidance/detection systems.
Standard

CONVECTIVE WEATHER DISPLAYS AND INDICATORS

2024-02-19
WIP
ARP7528
1.1 This document recommends criteria for electronic convective weather displays and indicators on the flight deck during the cruise, climb and descent phases of the flights. Windshear and microburst detection is addressed in ARP 4102/11D. 1.2 This ARP includes onboard weather radar, as well as other methods of identifying convective weather. It is recognized that radar is the primary means used today, but these criteria can be applied to any future technology that might be developed.
Standard

Communications and Navigation Equipment

2022-03-21
CURRENT
ARP4102/6A
This document recommends criteria for the control and display of communications and navigation equipment on the flight deck.
Standard

Crew Rest Facilities

2019-04-01
CURRENT
ARP4101/3A
This document recommends criteria for the design and installation of flight crew rest facilities (FCRF) on transport category aircraft when operations with an augmented flight crew are performed. NOTE: Within this ARP, the term “must” will indicate items required for compliance with outside known government regulations, especially 14 CFR Part 117. “Shall” describes sections which are required if this ARP is used as a means of compliance. The term “should” will indicate optional requirements, preferences, and recommendations of the approving SAE committee. Wherever noted and bracketed as [FAA] or [EASA], this document includes agency regulations for reference that are not otherwise evaluated herein.
Standard

DATA LINK

2007-07-11
CURRENT
ARP4102/13A
This document recommends criteria for a system designed to manage and communicate information via data link to support flight operations.
Standard

Data Link

2016-09-28
WIP
ARP4102/13B
This document recommends criteria for a system designed to manage and communicate information via data link to support flight operations.
Standard

Design Objectives for Handling Qualities of Transport Aircraft

2011-08-23
WIP
ARP4104A
This document specifies the requirements for the design objectives for handling qualities applicable to transport aircraft operating in the subsonic, transonic, and supersonic speed range. These objectives are not necessarily applicable to rotor or VTOL aircraft.
Standard

Display Latency Evaluation Procedures

2012-12-03
WIP
ARP6238
This Aerospace Recommended Practice will identify the problem with latency in the pilot's instrument control of an aircraft. Recommended evaluation techniques to characterize control problems will be documented.
Standard

FLIGHT DECK PANELS, CONTROLS, AND DISPLAYS

2007-07-10
CURRENT
ARP4102
This document recommends criteria for the design, installation and operation of panels, controls, and displays on the flight deck of transport aircraft.
Standard

FLIGHT DECK, HEAD-UP DISPLAYS

1994-05-01
HISTORICAL
ARP4102/8
This document recommends criteria for the design and installation of Head-Up Display (HUD) systems. The recommendations are applicable to HUD systems which display flight information focused at infinity in the forward field of view. This annex does not address devices for peripheral vision or displays worn by the pilot (goggles, helmet sights).
Standard

FULL-FORMAT PRINTER

1992-01-30
HISTORICAL
ARP4102/14
This document recommends criteria for the installation and operation of a printer on the flight deck, to supply the flight crew with hard copies of information that originates from data sources such as FMS, ELS, ACMS, CMS, and Data Link. These criteria are in addition to the specifications of the referenced ARINC Characteristic 744A.
Standard

Final Approach Spacing System (Fass)

2017-01-27
WIP
ARP5628A
This document recommends criteria and requirements for a Final Approach Spacing System (FASS) for transport aircraft. This is an Aerospace Recommended Practice to support the development of a Final Approach Spacing System (FASS) for Approach Spacing for Instrument Approaches (ASIA) operations.
Standard

Flight Deck Alerting System (FAS)

2017-01-27
WIP
ARP4102/4A
This document recommends design criteria for the Flight Deck Alerting System. The FAS shall enhance safety of flight by providing early crew recognition of aircraft system or component status or malfunction as well as of crew operational error. The FAS, therefore, relates to aircraft configuration and flight phase as well as the aircraft systems. To fulfill this objective, the FAS must attract the attention of the crew, must state with clarity the nature and location of the problem, and must be highly reliable and thoroughly responsive to the operational requirements and environment. Wherever possible, it should provide guidance as to the corrective action.
Standard

Flight Deck Alerting System (FAS)

2007-07-10
CURRENT
ARP4102/4
This document recommends design criteria for the Flight Deck Alerting System. The FAS shall enhance safety of flight by providing early crew recognition of aircraft system or component status or malfunction as well as of crew operational error. The FAS, therefore, relates to aircraft configuration and flight phase as well as the aircraft systems. To fulfill this objective, the FAS must attract the attention of the crew, must state with clarity the nature and location of the problem, and must be highly reliable and thoroughly responsive to the operational requirements and environment. Wherever possible, it should provide guidance as to the corrective action.
X