Search Results

This paper presents calculations of external car aerodynamics by using the Partial-Averaged Navier-Stokes (PANS) variable resolution model in conjunction with the Finite Volume (FV) immersed-boundary method. The work presented here is the continuation of the study reported in Basara et al. [1, 2]. In that work, it was shown that the same accuracy of predicted aerodynamic forces could be achieved for both types of computational meshes, the standard body-fitted mesh and the immersed boundary (IB) Cartesian mesh, by using the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) k-ζ-f model as well as by using the Partially-Averaged Navier-Stokes (PANS) method. Based on the accuracy achieved, Basara et al. [2] concluded that further work could focus on evaluating the turbulence modelling on the immersed boundary meshes only.

Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) computations of heat transfer involving wall bounded flows at elevated Prandtl numbers typically suffer from a lack of accuracy and/or increased mesh dependency. This can be often attributed to an improper near-wall turbulence modeling and the deficiency of the wall heat transfer models (based on the so called P-functions) that do not properly account for the variation of the turbulent Prandtl number in the wall proximity (y+< 5). As the conductive sub-layer gets significantly thinner than the viscous velocity sub-layer (for Pr >1), treatment of the thermal buffer layer gains importance as well. Various hybrid strategies utilize blending functions dependent on the molecular Prandtl number, which do not necessarily provide a smooth transition from the viscous/conductive sub-layer to the logarithmic region.

This paper presents calculations of external car aerodynamics by using the finite volume (FV) immersed-boundary method. The FV numerical codes primarily employ Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models. In recent years, and due to possibility to run very large computational meshes, these models are usually used in conjunction with the advanced near-wall models. Moreover, it has been often demonstrated that the accuracy of RANS near-wall models relies on the mesh quality near the wall so by the rule, larger number of wall body-fitted cell-layers are employed. An immersed boundary (IB) method becomes an attractive alternative to the ‘standard’ FV approaches especially when applied to low quality CAD data. In general, the IB method is less investigated and validated for the car aerodynamics, particularly in conjunction with advanced near-wall turbulence models and an adaptive mesh refinement (AMR).

This paper presents calculations of external car aerodynamics by using the Partial-Averaged Navier-Stokes (PANS) variable resolution model in conjunction with the finite volume (FV) immersed-boundary method. The work presented here is the continuation of the study reported in Basara et al. [1]. In that work, it was shown that the same accuracy of predicted aerodynamic forces can be achieved by using Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) k-ζ-f model on both types of meshes, the standard body-fitted (BF), and on the immersed boundary (IB) mesh. Due to all well-known shortcomings of the steady state approach, in this work we deal with the Partially Averaged Navier-Stokes (PANS), which belongs to the hybrid RANS-LES (scale resolving / high fidelity) methods. This approach was developed to resolve a part of the turbulence spectrum adjusting seamlessly from RANS to DNS (Direct Numerical Simulation).

In order to meet current and future emission and CO2 targets, an efficient vehicle thermal management system is one of the key factors in conventional as well as in electrified powertrains. Furthermore the increasing number of vehicle configurations leads to a high variability and degrees of freedom in possible system designs and the control thereof, which can only be handled by a comprehensive tool chain of vehicle system simulation and a generic control system architecture. The required model must comprise all relevant systems of the vehicle (control functionality, cooling system, lubrication system, engine, drive train, HV components etc.). For proper prediction with respect to energy consumption all interactions and interdependencies of those systems have to be taken into consideration, i.e. all energy fluxes (mechanical, hydraulically, electrical, thermal) have to be exchanged among the system boundaries accordingly.