Criteria

Text:
Display:

Results

Viewing 1 to 30 of 91
Standard
2013-07-18
This document recommends general specifications for the location, accessibility and restraint for those items of survival, emergency, and miscellaneous equipment which are intended to be used by the flight crew, and which are stowed on or near the flight deck.
Standard
2013-07-18
The purpose of this document is to recommend criteria for the provision of crew escape facilities from the flight deck area.
Standard
2013-07-18
This document recommends provisions for crew safety and survival which are intended to apply to cargo or combination aircraft and equipment.
WIP Standard
2013-05-30
This document recommends criteria for the design and installation of flight crew rest facilities on commercial transport aircraft capable of ultra long-range operations with augmented/enlarged crew complement.
WIP Standard
2013-05-22
This document recommends criteria for the installation and operation of a printer intended for use by flight crew members on the flight deck. The printer is used to supply the flight crew with hard copies of information that originates from data sources such as FMS, ELS/EDMS, ACMS, CMS, and data link.
WIP Standard
2013-05-22
This document establishes the minimum requirements for seats and restraint systems for the flight deck. Due to limitations that it would place upon basic aircraft design, it is not considered practical for these requirements to apply fully to the observer seat. However, it is emphasized that every effort should be made to provide the observer seat position with an equivalent level of comfort and safety. This document is also intended to make recommendations for flight crew restraint systems. A properly designed crew restraint system will mminimize injury or debilitation during a survivable crash and enable post crash assistance to occupants and escape from the aircraft. Crew member safety is the primary objective, with appropriate provisions for crew comfort taken into consideration. The criteria established herein are designed to standardize restraint systems without hindering the development of new, improved systems.
WIP Standard
2013-05-22
This document is intended to specify the environmental conditions for transport aircraft necessary to permit the crew to perform their duties and functions in comfort, with minimum fatigue and no distraction. Environment conditions should cause no short or long-term effects deleterious to health or physical well-being, nor significantly impair ability to perform normal or abnormal crew functions.
WIP Standard
2012-12-03
Loss-of-control is the major type of mishap to transport airplanes. This report will review loss-of-control events to revenue air carrier flights occurring from 1981 through 2010. During this period, 202 mishaps resulted in 8469 fatalities. Aerodynamic stalls (48 events; 1505 fatalities) was the most frequent cause. Spatial disorientation produced the second greatest number of fatalities (25 events; 1228 fatalities). Nineteen events involved faulty recovery techniques and resulted in 1329 fatalities. Areas for improvements in pilot training will be listed: Addressing loss of instrument skills; stall recovery training; and specific SDO training. Envelope protection appears to be the most significant airframe-related safety factor. Several high level recommendations will be listed.
WIP Standard
2012-12-03
This Aerospace Recommended Practice will identify the problem with latency in the pilot's instrument control of an aircraft. Recommended evaluation techniques to characterize control problems will be documented.
Standard
2012-11-19
This document is intended to establish preferred abbreviations and acronyms for terms used on panels, controls, displays, instruments, placards, and markings. The recommendations apply to equipment used by crew members in the flight deck of transport aircraft.
Standard
2012-07-31
This document recommends criteria for the installation and operation of a printer intended for use by flight crew members on the flight deck. The printer is used to supply the flight crew with hard copies of information that originates from data sources such as FMS, ELS/EDMS, ACMS, CMS, and data link.
Standard
2012-07-31
This document recommends design criteria for an Automatic Braking System. The ABS shall enhance braking performance under most aircraft configurations and all runway conditions.
Standard
2012-07-31
This document is intended to specify the environmental conditions for transport aircraft necessary to permit the crew to perform their duties and functions in comfort, with minimum fatigue and no distraction. Environment conditions should cause no short or long-term effects deleterious to health or physical well-being, nor significantly impair ability to perform normal or abnormal crew functions.
WIP Standard
2011-08-30
This document recommends design criteria for the Flight Deck Alerting System. The FAS shall enhance safety of flight by providing early crew recognition of aircraft system or component status or malfunction as well as of crew operational error. The FAS, therefore, relates to aircraft configuration and flight phase as well as the aircraft systems. To fulfill this objective, the FAS must attract the attention of the crew, must state with clarity the nature and location of the problem, and must be highly reliable and thoroughly responsive to the operational requirements and environment. Wherever possible, it should provide guidance as to the corrective action.
WIP Standard
2011-08-23
This anex recommends additional design objectives applicable when control laws or control characteristics are modified for the purpose of Flight Envelope Awareness/Protection. While only manually controlled flight is addressed, it is assumed that Autoflfight, Autothrottle, or Autothrust performance is compatible.
WIP Standard
2011-08-23
This document specifies the requirements for the design objectives for handling qualities applicable to transport aircraft operating in the subsonic, transonic, and supersonic speed range. These objectives are not necessarily applicable to rotor or VTOL aircraft.
WIP Standard
2010-08-12
Prevention of catastrophic upset mishaps cannot depend solely on recovery training. The proposed document should complement the training initiatives already in place. As a committee dealing with transport human factors and handling qualities, the output must consider both issues. At the same time, we cannot ignore initial and recurrent training issues and the widespread use of ground-based simulators. The plan would follow the approach taken in the 2003 S-7 white paper but would extend the scope to all forms of LOC, not just repeated rudder reversals. As with the white pa-per, the new document would have sections on transport handling qualities, flight control modes, aircraft displays, simulator requirements, and approval for IFR test evaluations as well as covering training issues. This new document would complement, not replace documents such as the Airplane Upset Recovery Training Aid. While the ultimate goal might be preparation of an Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP), the initial output might be an Aerospace Information Report (AIR) or an Aerospace Research Document (ARD) or both.
Standard
2010-06-10
This document recommends criteria for the location, arrangement and other requirements of aircraft circuit breakers and fuses on the flight deck.
WIP Standard
2009-10-22
This document recommends criteria for the layout and for the design, installation, and operation of flight deck facilities for transport aircraft.
WIP Standard
2009-04-30
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) recommends criteria for the design and installation of Head-Up Display (HUD) systems. The recommendations are applicable to HUD systems for transport category aircraft, which display flight information (focused at infinity) in the forward field of view. The HUD total system requirement recommendations shall primarily lead to certifiable fail-passive CAT III characteristics and performance. This document forms a part of these recommendations. This document does not address devices for peripheral vision of displays worn by the pilot, nor the presentation of enhanced vision system (EVS) information.
WIP Standard
2009-04-08
This document recommends criteria for the flight deck display of an On Board Weight and Balance System. The system may have the capability of a primary operational device or be a secondary advisory source of information of weight and center of gravity position. The recommendations apply to transport aircraft and describe the operational and functional requirements for the display of an On Board Weight and Balance System.
WIP Standard
2009-02-18
The purpose of this SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) is to establish guidelines for the implementation of Flight Deck Based Merging and Spacing (FDMS) on the flight deck of commercial aircraft. It is intended as a general guide toward standard practice, but may be subject to frequent changes to keep pace with experience and technical advances.
WIP Standard
2009-01-29
The purpose of this SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) is to establish guidelines for the implementation of Synthetic and Enhanced Vision Systems on the flight deck of commercial aircraft. It is intended as a general guide toward standard practice, but may be subject to frequent changes to keep pace with experience and technical advances.
WIP Standard
2008-06-05
This document recommends criteria for the design and installation of Autopilot, Flight Director and Autothrust Systems. These three systems are highly inerrelated and will be referred to generically as an Integrated Flight Guidance System (IFGS).
WIP Standard
2007-12-21
This appendix recommends display symbology for Electronic Engine Displays (ED) used on the flight deck of turbofan power transport aircraft.
WIP Standard
2007-12-21
This document recommends criteria to assure adequate visibility from the flight deck. The flight deck windshield must provide sufficient external vision to permit the pilot to perform any maneuvers within the operating limits of the aircraft safely and at the same time afford and unobstructed view of the flight instruments and other critical components and displays from the same eye position. This document recommends criteria to assure adequate visibility from the flight deck. The flight deck windshield must provide sufficient external vision to permit the pilot to perform any maneuvers within the operating limits of the aircraft safely and at the same time afford and unobstructed view of the flight instruments and other critical components and displays from the same eye position.
WIP Standard
2007-09-02
This Aerospace Standard (AS), establishes minimum performance standards for those sensors, computers, transponders, and airplane flight deck controls/displays which together comprise a Takeoff Performance Monitor (TOPM) System. This standard also defines functional capabilities, design requirements, and test procedures. A TOPM system is intended to monitor the progress of the takeoff and to provide advisory information which the crew may use in conjunction with other available cues to decide to continue or abort the takeoff. See Appendix A for supplementary information relating to NTSB, CAA, and ad hoc committee concerns and background information.
Standard
2005-11-28
This document recommends criteria and requirements for a Final Approach Spacing System (FASS) for transport aircraft. This is an Aerospace Recommended Practice to support the development of a Final Approach Spacing System (FASS) for Approach Spacing for Instrument Approaches (ASIA) operations.
Viewing 1 to 30 of 91