Search Results

Sub-23nm particles emission from the light-duty vehicle is widely discussed now and possible to be counted into the next stage emission legislation, such as Euro7. In this article, 16 China6 gasoline vehicles were tested over the WLTC and two surrogate RDE lab cycles for particulate number (PN) emission, the difference between PN23 (particle size >23nm) and PN10 (particle size>10nm) emission was analyzed. Testing results showed that the average PN10 emission increased 59% compared to PN23, which will bring great challenges for those vehicles to meet the future regulation requirement if sub-23nm particle is counted. The sub-23nm particles emission was proportional to the PN23 particles emission and generated mostly from the cold start or the transient engine conditions with rich combustion. Compared to the proposal of Euro 7, PN10 emission from some tested vehicles will need further two orders of magnitude reduction.

With the start of Euro 6d regulations, gasoline particulate filters (GPF) have become standard equipment in European vehicles with gasoline-direct-injection engines. GPFs will also be broadly applied to meet the upcoming China 6 regulations. An existing challenge with GPFs is accurate soot load detection to manage the pressure loss across the exhaust system and to protect the GPFs from soot overload, which could potentially cause damage as result of uncontrolled soot oxidations. Systems with the GPF located in the under-floor position have a higher potential risk of soot overload due to lower temperatures, which can result in higher soot accumulation rates. The accuracy of existing soot estimation methods such as evaluation of the pressure drop of the soot-loaded GPF or model-based balancing of soot accumulation versus soot oxidation rates are sensitive to transient operating condition of a vehicle.

Continuous improvement in vehicle emissions is necessary to meet ever tightening regulations. These regulations are advancing in both passenger and light truck vehicle markets, currently at different rates. Divergent design requirements and target markets for these platforms create unique conditions for aftertreatment needs. To understand the performance of various products in these categories and the potential for optimization, we examine various ultrathin-wall products in the context of a close-coupled configuration in a SULEV vehicle. In addition, these comparisons are carried over to a larger platform to show the performance trends in the context of the sport utility vehicle category. This study considers converter performance in FTP tests, examining bag data, light-off behavior, pressure drop comparisons and front and rear converter contributions. Conclusions are drawn regarding the optimization of converter substrate selection for various target design criteria